Yep - all it took was Shilpa saying that Vikas is the big bad villain who destroyed her career. All it took was her saying so without any credible facts, a consistent story, or indeed even coherently laying out what exactly he did to her.It bothers me, that all it takes for someone to be deemed guilty is a 'likeable' person saying they are. And people do find him guilty. If one deems Shilpa's hate-fuelled agenda acceptable, then by default one believes it's deserved. Because if Vikas didn't deserve it, why are people accepting of it?OT - You're a BB veteran OCK, and so you know, just as I do, that Shilpa went overboard on Thursday's episode, and that had it been any other season, she would've merited a tongue-lashing this weekend. Salman wasn't fair tonight, but I didn't expect to him to be. What I also didn't expect was that they'd outright praise Shilpa. But - TRP ke liye kuch bhi - I get that.Bullying is deeply subjective - no two incidents of it are the same. I do think Shilpa bullied Vikas in the Thursday episode. She knew he was stuck in one place, she knew he was affected and she still didn't draw the line, and stop - that, for me, is bullying. She was a bully because she doesn't know when to stop.Salman was unfair tonight because he validated Shilpa's grudges - he literally said that she's entitled to her 'kadwahat', while he, just like us, cannot say with even a semblance of certainty that Vikas deserves to be the target of said 'kadwahat'. And when Vikas tried to say that he does not deserve it - Salman cut him off. The guy was deemed guilty just to validate Shilpa's brand of 'entertainment'. That is what is unfair.And what is absolute BS is Salman trying to pass it off as equal - this is no mutual dushmani - this is one person's hate-fuelled vendetta against another. There is no equality there.