Gauhar's justification? - Page 2

bc I think she was feeling bad that she has hurt payal feelings

Originally posted by: ..Underworld..

What is Payal to Guahar? nothing as well

Gauhar's clarification reminds of the proverb 'chor ki dadi mein tinka'

I think she clarified for the audience really.

Edit: It's not a bad thing since her whole comment was edited and it only seemed like she said she hates Sangram which wasn't her whole statement.

Originally posted by: Caramel_21

A very simple question- Why did Gauhar justified and tried clearing her name about her "Nafrat" for Sangram Ji after Payal left?

Was it necessary??

Ab Bola to bola. What was the need to give explanation ki maine task ki wajah se bola. Even if she was trying to justify her words, as a viewer do you believe her words??

And Sangram, he looked least interested in listening to her and just kept saying "koi Baat nhi Gauhar ji, Koi Baat nhi..."

There was no need for explaining things to sangram,its not even worth
Sangram himself called hher naagin
thatsy he said koi baat nahi
haar kisi ke bare mein har koi bolta hain

Originally posted by: ..Underworld..

What is Payal to Guahar? nothing as well


Gauhar's clarification reminds of the proverb 'chor ki dadi mein tinka'

I think you conveniently ignore the rest of the explanations I give and see only what you want to see. So what was the need of replying to me and prompting a debate? Waste of my time, right, if I type out a rebuttal? Weird.

Originally posted by: Rahm

I think she clarified for the audience really.

Edit: It's not a bad thing since her whole comment was edited and it only seemed like she said she hates Sangram which wasn't her whole statement.

so many theories...whether she did it cuz of payal or for the audience... the fact is it was unncessary and made her look stupid...especially when sangram himself wasn't even interested in it

Originally posted by: gurl-enchanted

I think you conveniently ignore the rest of the explanations I give and see only what you want to see. So what was the need of replying to me and prompting a debate? Waste of my time, right, if I type out a rebuttal? Weird.

I didn't 'conveniently' ignore your other points...i just didnt find them convincing enough to take them into consideration

Originally posted by: ..Underworld..

I didn't 'conveniently' ignore your other points...i just didnt find them convincing enough to take them into consideration

Right. Nothing more to say then :-)

Originally posted by: gurl-enchanted

I think she did that cuz she felt bad that Payal felt bad. She doesn't care what Sangram thinks and has openly expressed she doesn't like him. Neither does she need his support. The only reason she clarified was cuz of Payal.

@Bold: Exactly. She doesn't like him and we have seen that on show many times. And I am sure like us even Payal is watching the show and knows about their equation. So her justifying to Sangram, as a viewer, came more across as a means to hide her action. She was doing it for her benefit rather than for Payal. It would have been better if she had simply let go off the issue instead of clarifying it with Sangram. 😊