This is sick! *Shocked* - Page 6

Originally posted by: simi13

tani is bewkoof.. ignore her.. uski bewkoofi pe thread kholte jaoge toh this forum will b full...of nonsense,.. ignore her... y do u even gv her tht much importance?😕

Originally posted by: Kpur_kpur

It is plain disgusting 😡. Tanisha is a sick lady. This season BB has lost all credibility and decency. Kamya is a strong person & she is a self made woman unlike Tanisha or Arman. One might or might not agree with Kamya's stand & it is a personal choice. But Tanisha making such derogatory statement is just not acceptable.

Thank you "Nxt_rockstar" for starting this Thread.

Originally posted by: shravin

Tanisha herself has two men to stand up for her. One is outside the house that is the host and one is her Armanji

Originally posted by: Kasu4lyfe

Did anyone catch what she said and how she contradicted herself. She just said that you should support your friend and stand by them no matter what even if they are wrong! So thats exactly what Gauhar did then why so much drama that she supported kushal where he wasnt completely wrong.

Originally posted by: enigmatic_zephy

yes tanisha has valid points in the argument- kamya does that..everything abt kamya was right..

even gauhar..she did use ksuhal

but what tanisha missed is that even she has tried to use that angle..

post asif's entry..she told armaan that gau-kushal is gaining popularity and next day bang..LS starts..

@to your question:

yes kamya does..she did try to use armaan..she did get bugged wid tanisha for she , prat and armaan were bonding more..

and yes kamya did fill every1's ears against tanisha..specially gau-kush..

wr do u think all the hatred has come into gau..but if not for kamya..and now how tanisha behaves is aftereffects of over 2 weeks of tanisha bullying that these people did..

Originally posted by: MS-meghasharma

my dislike for tanisha is just increasing day by day.

she is the worst person in the entire house.a disgusting and a horrible women.

i just wish salman khan gives this feeed back to tanisha...i would be more than glad!!!!!

Originally posted by: Nxt_rockstar

Kamya made a group with Armaan, she did favor him few times but never seek his support for fighting her battles. She fought alone. Armaan was never on her side in her fights.

If your definition of depending on man is limited to whether the man stood by the woman's side in her battles or not , then by that definition tanisha never used Arman either. She has never asked him, expected him or hoped for him to fight her battles.

But using a man has multiple facets to it. Kamya targeted armaan for a reason. When you have 15 odd people and you need a group to progress...you want a strong group...

Kamya totally was betting on Armaan and his alpha male status. The food fight, she instigated armaan to say what he did and not let drop the topic. Against gauhar. Lots of other things. She has tried to use him to play her games.

Kamya just spilled the beans. She told the truth to others. Tanisha did accuse Gauhar for flirting with Armaan. Tanisha for a fact did say so. So how she filled someone's mind??

Its the way you say it. And like tanisha said, she added namak mirchi to it.

Tanisha ain't the only one kamya has targetted, she does that always. Take what someone has said, twist it a bit or add non verbal communication to it which exemplifies the negative conotations of statements being quoted.

Kamya never spoon feed her opinion to others about Tanisha.

No one spoon feeds their opinions!...And thing with bitching is..human's have a misguided sense of premium self worth...when that gets hurt they flare up.

Kamya contorted stuff..don't be naive to think that gau-armaan statement is the only she has ever made to gauhar about tanisha..na na...just because that's what they showed in the episode.

Post anda story, people were negative abt tanisha. So kamya used the opportunity. she definitely quoted her..but added her own stuff..be it words or face expressions or enhanced negative connotations...to feed those hungry people..

I always accept that Kamya is a group player. she is expert in handling group dynamics. She at times plays the game well! But she never seeks support of any man for her matters. she solves them on her own.

Like I said, if fighting ones own battles is the criteria..tanisha doesn't fit the dependent woman category either. Kamya depends , totally depends on a male figure...because she knows that a woman power would never be recognized in a group that has a lot of egoists. Additionaly, when you have many people of same temperamental then it comes down to physicality.

More than anyone in this house, she and sangram are two people who can't play on their own. They always need someone to carry out their plans because these two are too cautious and cowards to come out in the open. They will always look for someone...they would always depend on someone. And this is a weakness.

Kamya has never answered a direct question. She twists words in privacy, if confronted she falters.../she tries to circumvent those questions but fails. Her failings are too obvious in her being and accepting and standing up as an independent player.

Whatever you think, it's your POV! You are entitled to have one. But being a neutral viewer, I see this as crossing the line. 😳

The fact that you take efforts to specifically bring out the point that you are a neutral viewer means only two things- either you are not a neutral viewer ( over defensive) or you consider my POV to be biased..and hence less creditworthy..

either way...

as far as i can see..

get your definition of what depending on man means to you..and then compare all the women...you will see..how logically your current assessment fails (given the definition that you have given)