Gauhar's Stand Was Wrong - Proven By Gauhar's Words - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

39

Views

3.5k

Users

20

Likes

316

Frequent Posters

SoPunk thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 11 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: Shreyacool

But Gauhar was never in the favour of Kushal getting into physical voilence. She was the one who stopped him from hitting andy. She had tried her best to stop kushal from throwing kachra on tanisha & saying bad things to her. This all mess happened bcoz of kushals dumbness & impatience.

Gauhars main point was why is physical voilence subjective? Why tanisha wasnt evicted for the same!


What stand she took against Kaushal? She said Kushal was wrong, only after coming back. If she had this realization before, she wouldn't have walked out with Kushal. That's precisely the reason she came back unconditionally, as she found her on a wrong footing.

Now bringing in Tanisha, doesn't make Kushal right, neither her stand right. Tanisha is a different issue, if she felt that was not right, she should have gone with Kushal when Kushal went over the wall or taken a firm stand like she took when Kushal was wrong.

She never stooped Kushal, she did some technical locha of prevention there, she was acting dual faced. When Kushal was never listening to her, did she take a firm stand? Did she tell the other HMs that stop him? Did she threaten Kushal ever of losing her friendship if he continues to abuse and excessive torture? What's she even angry once? Just saying like a Brocken record ..Kushal don't do it...Kushal don't do that...and Kushal not listening and she isn't disturbed by that...does it mean she stopped it?

She was playing a game on both side, she can jump into any side now, using those things. She enjoyed the abuse and torture and also said don't do...what does that mean?

Shreyacool thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: SoPunk



Let us first be clear, what was her stand on?


If it was against the decision given for Tanisha's incident, then that's her stand on Tanisha's incident.

She agrees that Kushal was wrong, so she has to agree on BB's decision to evict him.

She never stopped Kushal to abuse and pour in those things... She was merely saying for the sake of saying. Like when two people fight and friends fake to stop it. Why didn't she take a stand on Kushal then for not listening to her and pouring those things in such quantity and abusing her first?

What's important to her, her own words or BB's verdict, to take a stand on?

She can't play it both way, you know?



Havent you watched the episode?

Gauhar was not saying for the sake of it infact she was screaming aloud at kushal. Even though it wasnt her job but the captains duty! Kushal had bought that box full of dust, it was gauhar who didnt let him put it in viveks box.
HashiBoo thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#13
You can say anything regarding her stand .. But her stand was for "why is physical voilence subjective? Why tanisha wasnt evicted for the same! and sending Kushal home for the same ""
Even Salman agreed that BB should have sent arman and tanisha too ..
SoPunk thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 11 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: Shreyacool



Havent you watched the episode?

Gauhar was not saying for the sake of it infact she was screaming aloud at kushal. Even though it wasnt her job but the captains duty! Kushal had bought that box full of dust, it was gauhar who didnt let him put it in viveks box.


So, what did she do, when Kushal wasn't listening to her? Supported him later and took a stand on his side...right ?? 😉😆 Does that scream about the emptyness of those words and her intent?
SoPunk thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 11 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: HashiBoo

You can say anything regarding her stand .. But her stand was for "why is physical voilence subjective? Why tanisha wasnt evicted for the same! and sending Kushal home for the same ""

Even Salman agreed that BB should have sent arman and tanisha too ..


I think BB has made that very clear, every physical touch/contact is not physical violence.

One which is with the intent of causing damage. Tanisha irritated Kushal by contact, but has never looked to threaten or with an intent to cause damage to him.

While, if Kushal wasn't stopped, Andy could be severely injured. So what Salman says isn't important.
Every issue is unique and needs to be analyzed according to it's own situation and circumstances, the context is unique, so these cannot be compared this way. That's how the legal system also work.

That's why every case is judgeed seperately and punished differently according to it's context.
Edited by SoPunk - 11 years ago
826374 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#16
gohar makkar aur jhoothi aurat hai , now gobar ko andy ke humour bhi nasty lagta hai , bcs dis time he tried his humour on her , asif ke time pe andy ne issay bahot jyada kiya , tab gohar ko koi problem nhi thi , ulta she was enjoying , laughing det time , in other words she was enjoying asif's humiliation

after det task 2 people raised their voice against dis humiliation in det court task , tan n asif , we saw how gobar n her party people were making fun of dem , yelling on dem .

kushaal taaliya baja rha tha like a stupid boy , big boss supported gohar n gifted her 500 points bcs bigboss was biased , n after det table turned , same andy did same thing wid gohar n her bully gang , n den ,boom ...she crated a big scene

now gohar is saying " task bhi limit mai rah ke karna chahiye , task ki limit hoti hai " ...same thing tan n asif were saying in det court task , but ye log unka fun bana rhey thay ki task mai yehi hota hai n people were saying on dis forum " task nhi kar sakte toh big boss aaye kyu "

now gobar n his bully gamg ko limit yaad aa gyi , waah bhayi waah , how convenient


now toh it's very clear she herself said kushal was wrong , so yes her stand was also wrong , det was hinsa n very aggressive behaviour fro kushal
funny thing is dis kushaal interview de rha hai usnai galat nhi kiya , n gohar bol rhi hai kushaal wrong tha 😆

Edited by ANNMT. - 11 years ago
motormouth thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#17

Originally posted by: HashiBoo

You can say anything regarding her stand .. But her stand was for "why is physical voilence subjective? Why tanisha wasnt evicted for the same! and sending Kushal home for the same ""

Even Salman agreed that BB should have sent arman and tanisha too ..



Physical violence is subjective to biggboss just like respect to women is subjective to gauhar

If tanisha is disrespected it is task but if gauhar is disrespected it is disrespect to women
Ajeeb logic hai
SoPunk thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 11 years ago
#18

Originally posted by: motormouth



Physical violence is subjective to biggboss just like respect to women is subjective to gauhar

If tanisha is disrespected it is task but if gauhar is disrespected it is disrespect to women
Ajeeb logic hai


Yes, the world moves around Gauhar...

As if Gauhar is not in BB hous, butGauhar has hired BB to run her house... So the rules should be as Gauhar wants it to be...😆
empusa thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#19

Originally posted by: SoPunk


Let us first be clear, what was her stand on?


If it was against the decision given for Tanisha's incident, then that's her stand on Tanisha's incident.

She agrees that Kushal was wrong, so she has to agree on BB's decision to evict him.

She never stopped Kushal to abuse and pour in those things... She was merely saying for the sake of saying. Like when two people fight and friends fake to stop it. Why didn't she take a stand on Kushal then for not listening to her and pouring those things in such quantity and abusing her first?

What's important to her, her own words or BB's verdict, to take a stand on?

She can't play it both way, you know?


You said it right..she cant do all..means she cant do BB's job right ???
She was under the assumption that like tamisha got merely a warning and was spared calling it as kushal;s bhadaas nikhalana..she thought BB would be consistent in his decision but that did not happen ..coz as per BB the same thing was not called bhadaas nikhalana but a strategy...

anyone at her place would get pissed off at this biasedness and she merely pointed out that..

and about asking kushal to stop ...she did her best thats what i feel...and lets not forget even sangram was pouring lot of stuff...more than gauhar...apoorva should have handled...what all should gauhar look at ???😕 if the dumping of the stuffs were so offensive why did not BB stopped kushal then n there like they did for Andy...so according to them kushal dint cross the limits..or why else BB was silent at that time...

so for gauhar the thing important is consistency in BB's decision...its not about her words or stand...
Carabelli5 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 11 years ago
#20
She said that Kushal's reaction was wrong not his stand. This is smthg she has been saying since the whole fiasco intiated. Her point was that since tanisha was pardoned last week due to her claim of women's disrespect same should have been applicable this week. Thus Kushal might have been wrong in his action but it should have been treated the same as last week by BB.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".