Posted:
Originally posted by: xyzxyzxyzxyz
^^umm..if you say that you hate kushal coz of what he did to tanisha, shouldn't you hate andy for what he did to gauhar? aren't rational people uniform like that?
Also, if we make fun of contestants coz of their hypocrisy and detest it..isn't there a saying..practice=preach! why hate x for their hypocrisy if that's exactly what you'll do!And that was not directed to anyone in particular but I'm sure your content was directed towards me..coz otherwise such randomness wouldn't make sense
well...I still don't understand how you can put the two situations on one one scale and weigh it. Yes, I hated Kushal for what he did with Tanisha; and almost everyone agrees that whatever happened with Gohar was not right under the guise of task. However, that happened between Gohar and Andy...why must Kushal interfere? Had she hit him, it would have been justified. I don't find why Kushal intervened...IMO he intervened to release his pent up frustrations from before. Tanisha's and Gauhar's situation is alike only to an extent and then both branch off. If Kushal was given the benefit of doubt for doing task, so should Andy be given that same doubt. I don't think it's fair though to hold members accountable for their stance...no one here has claimed they practice what they preach, no one's self righteous. When the contestants themselves are not able to practice what they preach, why should I as an audience give them benefit of doubt? Today Pratyusha stood up for women, yesterday she called another woman "bar girl"...I can't take her seriously no matter how right she may be. That's just how I broke down the dynamics today.
Cricket
Suggestions / Comments
