What was GG saying to Pritam in pre-cap? - Page 3

Originally posted by: Picasso9

Mado, congrats for the new word coinage for Gullu - Purshottam...

Originally posted by: nadalfan8989

Oh really, he took his wife's name... wow ... anything else

Did he say his wife is a lawyer also ???

what a crime...I demand supreme court to amend the law and punish GG with 2000 years of prison without any trail...how dare he ask pritam about his wife name ? ?? ? He is such a pathetic looser

Originally posted by: girlie_giggles

Check your facts...

It was Gautam who commented about Dimpy's father and his profession!!!!

Kuch Bhi...

Originally posted by: BullsEye777

Now watch a palti happen that there is nothing wrong in bringing in a father's profession since it was a compliment😆

Originally posted by: Jasjit18

don't worry pritam is not in the forums so there won't be any palti

Originally posted by: MadOwhat

Sorry but Gautam never claimed to be Purshottam. Maybe you see him that way😊 Gautam has always claimed to be a regular, normal person who gets hurt, who makes mistakes and he even says sorry and accepts his mistakes. Perhaps you are confusing him with sacha Acha aam Paltiman.🤢

😆 oh how intelligent you are. Arguing semantics. Wah! Btw I didn't agree to anything in you post. 😆

Thank you so much for point out the satire and 'projections' in your post. Next time I will also need to put a disclaimer then you will know that I didn't take 'purshottam' to mean God. But if that's what's on your mind when it comes to Gautam... Far be it for me to disillusion you. 😆

Originally posted by: MadOwhat

Yesterday's episode showcased Gautam Gulati in real light...hopefully an EYE OPENER

A DECEITFUL AND SELFISH PERSON - he saved the person whom he dislikes the most over his SELF PROCLAIMED friend and sister, Sambhavna ...just because Tanna nominated Ali and served his self interest ( aka support...he got his sweet revenge on Ali)...and all the favors done by his sister/friend are conveniently forgotten...he always bites the hand that feeds him.🤢 ...And had a cheek to contest Salman's statement " Aise rahega to, Tu akela marega" ...relations can't be a one way street to bathroom.

A HYPOCRITE - Tanna chaude mein claimed she is selfish ...unlike Gautam ...who projects himself as PURSHOTTAM ( Mr Perfect) ...but in reality is the most self centred contestant.🤢...he wants the house to operate like a Gaular system...with rest of the contestant orbiting around him all the time.a

A FAKESTER - pretending to be isolated and cornered...when it is he who is actually making the choice to be so...further blaming people for not supporting him.🤢

A BAD LOSER - Upen asked him to confront Ali, he refused saying God is watching and he will ignore what happened and let God decide.Later in the day he is seen taking personal dig at Pritam for Ali's provocation...Pritam was his competitor in the task ..what a sore loser.🤢

A CHEAPSTER - Ali took personal digs with a clear disclaimer that he was making a fictitious story ...but he gets Pritam's real wife in the picture...that makes his more CHEAPER and DISGUSTING than Ali.🤢 ...atleast Ali doesn't claim "mera dil saaf hai"

The guy may still con gullible audience and win ...but a certain LOSER in life 🤢

Originally posted by: Picasso9

😆 oh how intelligent you are. Arguing semantics. Wah! Btw I didn't agree to anything in you post. 😆

Thank you so much for point out the satire and 'projections' in your post. Next time I will also need to put a disclaimer then you will know that I didn't take 'purshottam' to mean God. But if that's what's on your mind when it comes to Gautam... Far be it for me to disillusion you. 😆

Originally posted by: MadOwhat

Now you have stopped discussing Gautam and started discussing Madowhat ...what happened...nothing to talk about in Gautam's defence??😆

Talking about semantics ...in the whole post, the only thing you countered was the word Purshottam ...that made you take an effort to reply...unless you express you disagreement in installments😛...one reply post for one point😉

Not taking chances with you having figured your approach hence... the God incarnate statement was a preemptive measure...to avoid you straying again.

Sorry darling your preemptive measure was wasted on me.

Also I chose to respond on one point. My prerogative. I don't need to follow your rules. So you seem to be 'purshottam' because you figured my approach. Wah. 😆

I only discussed you because you veered into discussion of me and 'my jumping the gun'.

Perhaps you need to practice what you preach. Stop assuming that the context was not understood and stop transferring inadequacies on others. Assuming lack of common sense and then puffing up about over estimating and needing disclaimers.😕 Read the thread again. 😊