A Question from all of you..

The old one. Today was so boring. I couldn't even watch it. I watch WKV to hear Salmans hilarious commentary and input, not to watch the HM fight while Salman looks on. We already do that on the weekdays.

I watch BB for the weekends and salman sarcasm and commentory. It was very boring today but its okay, the reason was understandable.

And i think, if he's host's like today, he wont be called biased or unfair or wateva!

i really missed the old salman khan, fun and full of life, todays episode made me want to cry.😭

Originally posted by: tinaaa

<font size="3" face="Courier New, Courier, mono" color="#990066">No Comment, No Opinion, No Conclusion.. No Smile, No Anger.. No Praise, No Scolding..</font>

<font size="3" face="Courier New, Courier, mono" color="#990066">
</font>

<font size="3" face="Courier New, Courier, mono" color="#990066">Today Salman just highlighted some issues, showed relevant supporting evidences and let the audience draw their own conclusions..</font>

<font size="3" face="Courier New, Courier, mono" color="#990066">
</font>

<font size="3" face="Courier New, Courier, mono" color="#990066">Now the question is: which of his hosting style do you prefer.. the old one or the new one.. ???</font>

<font size="3" face="Courier New, Courier, mono" color="#990066">
</font>

<font size="3" face="Courier New, Courier, mono" color="#990066">Share your thoughts keeping in view both the perspectives.. first that which style is suitable for him to save himself from the allegation of a "biased host".. and second that which style is best for show's entertainment and viewers' expectations point of view..</font>

He started the show with talking about the Peshawar incident. I think he was upset about the massacre and felt it was wrong on so many levels to have the usual fun WKW. It would have been bad if he started the talk with the incident and went on with the show the usual way as if nothing happened. Plus maybe he was still upset with what happened last week. He did right.