Gautam vs Upen

I am a neutral viewer for BB8.

Don't understand how Gautam's act is similar to Upen's?

I mean if Gautam was given the power to nominate and he nominated Dimpy then I would call that backstabbing. But he did not do that, as he was not given the right to nominate, and if he was given that power, the he would not nominate her. He did not save Dimpy and did not nominate her, so what's the fuss?

Whereas Upen's act was so obvious and tactical, as he nominated P3G and Sonali. If Upen did not nominate Pritam and Puneet, then I would say Gautam and Upen's act were similar.

They are two completely different entities.

If Dimpy was up for eviction. I'm sure Gautam would have saved her. If he is given that chance now, he would save her.

You are right no similarities whatsoever, Gautams action were un-biased and to not support his friends and be fair. Upen's actions were biased and to support his friends only even if they did perform poorly.

I'd say Gautam's captaincy so far - Brilliant!

ZOMG HOW CAN YOU SAY ANYTHING POSITIVE ABOUT GELATO DON'T YOU KNOW HE'S DEVIL INCARNATE DON'T WORSHIP SATAN

Originally posted by: sha1

You are right no similarities whatsoever, Gautams action were un-biased and to not support his friends and be fair. Upen's actions were biased and to support his friends only even if they did perform poorly.

I'd say Gautam's captaincy so far - Brilliant!

Originally posted by: Atomicbomb

That means Upen is a much more loyal friend.

Maybe why he gets on with the majority of the house and hardly voted for eviction.

Unlike Gautam.

Upen is playing in hiding. He picks up fights with Ali and Gautam only as he know all bully them.
Too many things are going on in the house for people to even think of Upen. Kind of like Natasha, where no one remembered her. Bigg boss has to do something to get Upen nominated just like how Natasha got nominated.

Also during captaincy, friendship is not tested, unbiased/fair captaincy is tested.

Originally posted by: Atomicbomb

They are two completely different entities.

Truth of the matter is Dimpy stood by Gautams captaincy when no one did. She even let go of the ring so he could be captain

. She has listened and preformed her tasks.

Least he could have done is save her from eviction so returning the favor.

If Puneet was up for eviction sure Gautam would have saved him.

This only shows he only cares whether people support and if he isn't close will just use ppl for his own benefit.

First of all Gautam never told Dimpy to support him. It was Dimpy who wanted to befriend Gautam and make him captain.

Originally posted by: Atomicbomb

That means Upen is a much more loyal friend.

Maybe why he gets on with the majority of the house and hardly voted for eviction.

Unlike Gautam.

There are some high moral values being demonstrated by Gautam here.

Originally posted by: Atomicbomb

That means Upen is a much more loyal friend.

Maybe why he gets on with the majority of the house and hardly voted for eviction.

Unlike Gautam.

Sure but lets complete what you are trying to say- By that Logic Gautam is a better leader and an un-biased captain who can be trusted as being fair.

Fairness garners good friends not opportunists like Upen patel's friends in the house. 😉