How could Green zone members have protected their bags? - Page 3

Originally posted by: Aegon

Then voting would have been better option

Or taking out water from cups to remove people from captaincy

Why this task where physical violence was allowed?

If green team had no role in this game, why are they getting hurt?

Green team r getting hurt bcoz they r idiots who r resisting , if red team decided that they will take thier bag they don't have much choice they should let it go coz round will not end until they get thier bags..

If BB wanted the HM’s to strategise, then, he would have given something else other than the bag. Something which cannot b snatched.

Originally posted by: Aarzoo47

Green team r getting hurt bcoz they r idiots who r resisting , if red team decided that they will take thier bag they don't have much choice they should let it go coz round will not end until they get thier bags..

Did BB say that they don't have to protect their bags?

Originally posted by: Aegon

Did BB say that they don't have to protect their bags?

Protect thier bags by convincing and giving them laalach so that they don't agree on your bag ..

Originally posted by: Aarzoo47

Protect thier bags by convincing and giving them laalach so that they don't agree on your bag ..

If all they had to do was convincing, why was physical violence allowed? Why were contestants sitting on vehicles with their bags?

If they didn’t have to protect it and everything was in red zone contestants hand, it could have been done by voting too

Do you not see that you are not making any sense?

Originally posted by: Aegon

If all they had to do was convincing, why was physical violence allowed? Why were contestants sitting on vehicles with their bags?

If they didn’t have to protect it and everything was in red zone contestants hand, it could have been done by voting too

Do you not see that you are not making any sense?

Bb expected that red zone will fight among themselves, for example nikki would want to take abhi out but pavi will protect him etc, in that case there will be keecha taani but between red zone members...

Originally posted by: Aarzoo47

Bb expected that red zone will fight among themselves, for example nikki would want to take abhi out but pavi will protect him etc, in that case there will be keecha taani but between red zone members...

Don't think so

In that case, BB would have removed Eijaj in someway so red zone members end up fighting but BB allowed physical violence and snatching so Eijaj wins

Red zone people are not getting anything, who will Eijaj save, Kavita or Pavitra?

Maybe he'll get a chance to save 5 people as he is the chosen one

Originally posted by: Aegon

There wasn't enough time for negotiations

Red Team wanted Eijaj as captain, they wouldn't listen to anyone

thats your assumption

not everyone of them is a close friend of ejaz

Originally posted by: ayaan786

thats your assumption

not everyone of them is a close friend of ejaz

That's not my assumption

They selected him as captain unanimously, you can watch the episode for more details

Originally posted by: Aegon

That's not my assumption

They selected him as captain unanimously, you can watch the episode for more details

They did choose Eijaz unanimously but other housemates could have tried to change their decisions instead of dealing among themselves they could have tried. Nishant, Jasmine and Eijaz did it. Kavita also said I was fair captain(not dictator or something) so choose me. It was skewed in favor of red zone as they were to choose captain ultimately so instead of voting BB came up with a fun/game of elimination from captaincy race. Members of Green team was suppose to convince red team to not take their bags Not use force to Save their bags and vice versa. It’s was weird though but Red team had right to eliminate or take the bag if they aren’t convinced. So although it’s one sided and fully biased red team could take anyone’s bag by telling them I don’t consider you as captain or You did not convince me. No fight no kicha tani totally based on red team whom they want to make captain. Biased YES fully agreed, make sense NO, wrong game no it was fun voting, just like nomination here green team had no say but the people they nominated had the chance to choose captain which from game point of view quiet interesting and strategic.