Originally posted by: Picasso9
Of course. He’s not tharki like shukla and paras. There’s a difference. And don’t be a late lateef and talk about episodes past. Talk about current. Talk about growth. He does not have to be cheap to be in every shot. If Himanshi is laundiya, then Paras and shukla are like male prostitutes.
What's wrong in talking about what's happened in the past? Is there any rule on this place that says past eppys and situations cannot be discussed? This show is such that past doings/going ons are gonna be have to be referred to.
And laundiya isn't a bad, dirty word or anything, you know.
If Shukla and whoever are male prostitutes then not sure what you gonna call a guy who does chipka-chipka with a lady who was supposed to be in a committed relationship on the outside. 😆
Edited by KunwaariDaayan - 5 years ago