Hi guys, allow me to rant a bit here.
I am not active on the forum. And, I had moved off MP serial last year, given its unbearable drag. However, I got back sometime back, and have caught up with it now. Meaning, I stand corrected on my below comments😊. And, these comments are on the characters as portrayed in the serial. We know that history is a mystery in this serial.
And , though I am not active on forum and making posts these days, this week episodes have pushed me into this. So, you know what is coming in😉.
Maharana Pratap succumbing to his death sentence - does this make sense?? I will come to this shortly, before that I have to deal with few others and have been wanting to do this for sometime now and let me spare none here.
Mewar Naresh - sorry, but to tell you the truth, you bark most of the time. One can be firm and strict still otherwise! A failed father, a failed husband though you have also been good at times. You should have been a nyay' father and nyay' husband as well. Right from Shakti days, it is obvious that you brew contempt in the child's heart. When you have the time to get multiple children, you should also have had the time and responsibility to treat them all well and importantly, ensuring the right environment where the brothers are united and stand up together for your Mewar. Unlike Jagmal, whose mother would have anyway spoilt him, it was not the case with Shakti. Also, as you did for Pratap, did you try to figure out the truth (as in the case of Pratap) instead of going by his silence and awarding death sentence. Now, who is going to bark at you? Would you allow anyone? I see no hope in you.
Coming to the nyay' Raja, let us take the current thread. Agreed, he is on nyay sinhaasan and so there is no room for emotions or beliefs; judgment can only be based on evidence. But he needs to ensure that the vichar is complete and all points are considered. While he caught Pattha's point seeing the gun in Pratap's hand, why could he not take cue from an important input that the first gunshot had happened before Pratap had arrived, in other words, he rushed to the spot hearing that. This means, there is already someone out there doing on the crime. Also, if Pratap had wanted to kill them, he would have had the gun with him (even if we want to assume that he is not capable of dealing with Jagmal without a gun!) and would have done this stealthily. And he would not have cared to get him treated. Also, did it not occur to you to ask why Dhaman was present there then? Judgment cannot be just blindly passed on evidence, evidence need to be corroborated with the situation also. It is like giving death sentence to a woman who liked a man to protect herself, just because she had the gun on the hand. Now, I have a question, let us say Pratap is going to say that he did not kill Dhaman and Jagmal did. Will the king now believe Pratap and give sentence to Jagmal?? As, only the words of the accused or the witness alone matter?
When you tried to find out the truth post DB attack, you narrowed down intelligently on the place where the witness could be. Now, when you were questioning each one, when your sipaih told about Pratap's escape, you left this job midway just like reacting irresponsibly, forgetting that that you are close to a key witness. Nyay raja also needs to have control on his emotions and need to be cool headed. Even if you wanted to leave chasing Pratap, this job could be have been assigned to someone else. How could you let of such a crucial, rather the only witness like that nyay priya Raja?
C'mon nyaya Raja, am not asking you to not punish Pratap, all am asking is be nyay' by analyzing the case properly. Even in the case of JB, you immediately accused Ajabde. Even if you do not trust Ajabde, don't you know your JB well. Will she go away from the palace just like that because of the kid's charge? She could have still resigned in the palace than running away. Also, you know Ajabde's character, where is that input gone now? Did you pause to think even for a moment if she is capable of such a thing, nyay king? Even if you did not want to believe her earlier words on DB, and even if you had not acted earlier taking cue from that there is an internal enemy as well, you could now atleast considered that could be a reason for JB leaving - that someone is still plotting behind to get rid of Ajabde. But you, the nyay king, were carried away by your emotion of loosing JB, that's all and this blinded all other factors and thereby you awarded a wrong judgment to Ajabde. And, when Pratap said that Ajabde could not have done this and you decided to bring her back, I did not see a trace of pain in your face. As a nyaya king should you not have writhed in pain for the injustice done to her then. I think you should have just said that as Pratap still loves her, to make him happy he will allow her entry - this would have been better, instead of asking after eight years what he thinks of the allegation. Shame on you indeed.
And why did you not try to bring JB back, when Pratap knows her whereabouts. Did you really bother to find her? Or happily settled now with DB?
And as a king, did you try to figure out on the attacks on Pratap all along? Not all were traced to Mughals. There was some hope with JB around, now with you having completely lost yourself to DB, I have no hope at all. But I still like your love and faith in Pratap.
JB: I am not going to spare you either Rani ma. Right from his childhood, Pratap has been a victim of many attempted murders. And you were smart enough to trace most of them to DB. While, I appreciate that you want to be politically right, were you right in the way you dealt with it? If you did want to directly take on DB, you could have still brought her out in front of Rana by other means. Also, your mathrubhoomi prem and dharm, should have pushed you to save Pratap the future of a secured Mewar (even if you want to take it lightly viewing him as a son!!). You could have planted some means smartly by which you could have collected evidence that would speak against DB and also discussed the matter with Rawatji, who loves and believes in Pratap and who also has an influence on the king. He could have helped you to unearth the truth. Even if not directly accusing DB, you could have taken his help to get the evidences, in the interest of Pratap. You also later left the palace not thinking of the consequence - life threats on Pratap and Ajabde, you cannot just leave them like that. You cannot say Ajabde will take care, as you know she would be going to her parents for some years. You should have dealt the situation better. You did not even think over it, you reacted emotionally. You could have always found other means to get VB and US together. And, it is not just because of you that US is not going to VB, in which case he would not have borne the kid through DB. Also, even if you wanted to put VB before Pratap's security, given your knowledge of DB you would know that she would make it difficult for VB. So your decision is flawed, as any decision based on emotion would be. You have failed here as a mother and as a responsible queen.