Posted:
after watching this show I m very disappoint with history...how can historian do this to maharana partap ... I read many books on Akbar ... and on Mughal conquests...
I mean look at the maharna partap in historical accounts he was great warrior and freedom fighter...who never bowed down to Akbar ...never gave up againt Mughal and never disheartened from his fellow Rajput kings treachery ... right ?...'
but now I knew better of him through this show... he is just invincible... he is like vampire or a super hero ... no army even of 100, 000 + ,..can stand againt one partap... so how can historian claim chittor can ever fall when there was partap... how can history do this to partap... I read Akbar stayed for some couple of years in chittor after siege of chittor... now I found this a big joke ... how can Akbar dared to stay in chittor as conqueror when there was partap... can u imgain ..I cant imagine...
now I knew better that Akbar was always getting jealous and mad at every victory and every success of partap and I was in misconception tht Akbar was the one who was actually getting success by hook and crook at every passing day ...now I knew better forget about chittor partap was not letting Akbar take any other Rajput state ...
how can historian do this to maharana partap.. very bad
Debate Mansion
Hindi TV Shows
