timepass thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#1
From the precap we see that Pratap has captured Bairan Khan and dragged him in the middle of village. Bairam Khan is defeated and surrendered...he is waiting for his death and Pratap is about to kill him with his sword...
But from the history, Pratap never killed Bairam Khan...IF CV's show that Pratap killed him then it will be a huge blunder.....

What you guys say??

Created

Last reply

Replies

11

Views

11k

Users

7

Likes

13

Frequent Posters

Donjas thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#2
It is already a blunder. I don't know of any war in which Bairam Khan fought against Maharana Pratap.The mughals were not involved in the Bundi war.
If I am wrong please guide me to any article on the internet so that my historical knowledge improves.
..Pankhudi.. thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#3
Bairam khan wasn't killed in any war i know it for sure . Let's see what happens!
shrinath thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: timepass

From the precap we see that Pratap has captured Bairan Khan and dragged him in the middle of village. Bairam Khan is defeated and surrendered...he is waiting for his death and Pratap is about to kill him with his sword...

But from the history, Pratap never killed Bairam Khan...IF CV's show that Pratap killed him then it will be a huge blunder.....

What you guys say??


You are right.

Bairam Khan also Bayram Khan (Persian: ) (died 1561) was an important military commander, among top generals, later commander in chief of the Mughal army, a powerful statesman and regent at the court of the Mughal emperors Humayun and Akbar, also guardian, chief mentor, advisor, teacher and most trusted person of Humayun.Humayun honored him as Khan Khanan,means king of kings.Bairam actually was not "Khan",his real name was Bairam "Beg".Shah of Iran,Tamasp,honored him as 'Kha' or Khan. [1][2]

Early life[edit]

Bairam Khan was born in Badakhshan, now in present day Afghanistan, and belonged to the Baharlu clan of the Turkmen Kara Koyunlu tribe. The Kara Koyunlu had ruled Western Persia for decades before being overthrown by their Ak Koyunlu rivals. Bairam Khan's father and grandfather had previously joined in Babur's service.[1]

Military service[edit]

Bairam entered Babur's service at the age of 16 and played an active role in the early Mughal conquests of India.[3] Bairam Khan later contributed greatly to the establishment of the Mughal empire under Humayun. Under Humayan he was entrusted the position of muhradr (keeper of the seals) and took part in military campaigns in Benares, Bengal and Gujarat.[3] He accompanied Humayun during his exile in Persia and helped conquerKandahar before serving as its governor for nine years. In 1556, he played a leading role as a commander in Humayun's reconquest of Hindustan.[4]

Following Humayun's death in 1556, Bairam Khan was appointed Regent over the young monarch Akbar. As regent, he consolidated Mughal authority in northern India and most notably led Mughal forces at the Second Battle of Panipat, which was fought between Akbar and the Hindu king Hemu in Nov. 1556.

Later years[edit]

Afghan at Patan, 1561, Akbarnama

Bairam Khan was a Shia muslim and was disliked by the Sunni Turkic nobles.[5] Bairam was dismissed from Akbar's service in 1560. He subsequently chose to leave India to perform the hajj pilgrimage inMecca.[6]

While travelling through Gujarat,[7] he was assassinated by Hazi Khan Mewati of Alwar, who was the General and close confidant of Hindu Kings of North India Hemu, and was staying at Patan after Akbar's forces captured Alwar Sarkar in 1559. One day when Bairam Khan was at Sahstraling Talav, a religious site, he was recognised by Lohani Pashtun an associate of Hazi Khan Mewati, whose father had been killed in Second Battle of Panipat (1556), five years ago, which was led by Bairam Khan. Hazi Khan attacked and killed Bairam Khan, to take the revenge of his father's death and due to jealousy towards him, being a Shia muslim. Bairam Khan died on 31 January 1561. However, his son and wife were allowed to go free and sent to north India. Bairam Khan's wife, who was also the cousin of Akbar, married Akbar after Bairam Khan's death and later on Bairam's son, Abdul Rahim Khan-i-khana, got an important assignment in Akbar's administration and was one of the 'Nau-rattans' (Nine Gems) of Akbar.

Donjas thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#5
Shrinath, you clearly know a lot about the history of this period. Could you please tell me if the Mughals were involved in any way in the Battle of Bundi.
If they were involved then did Bairam Khan have anything to do in this battle.
nirmita thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: shrinath


You are right.

Bairam Khan also Bayram Khan (Persian: ) (died 1561) was an important military commander, among top generals, later commander in chief of the Mughal army, a powerful statesman and regent at the court of the Mughal emperors Humayun and Akbar, also guardian, chief mentor, advisor, teacher and most trusted person of Humayun.Humayun honored him as Khan Khanan,means king of kings.Bairam actually was not "Khan",his real name was Bairam "Beg".Shah of Iran,Tamasp,honored him as 'Kha' or Khan. [1][2]

Early life[edit]

Bairam Khan was born in Badakhshan, now in present day Afghanistan, and belonged to the Baharlu clan of the Turkmen Kara Koyunlu tribe. The Kara Koyunlu had ruled Western Persia for decades before being overthrown by their Ak Koyunlu rivals. Bairam Khan's father and grandfather had previously joined in Babur's service.[1]

Military service[edit]

Bairam entered Babur's service at the age of 16 and played an active role in the early Mughal conquests of India.[3] Bairam Khan later contributed greatly to the establishment of the Mughal empire under Humayun. Under Humayan he was entrusted the position of muhradr (keeper of the seals) and took part in military campaigns in Benares, Bengal and Gujarat.[3] He accompanied Humayun during his exile in Persia and helped conquerKandahar before serving as its governor for nine years. In 1556, he played a leading role as a commander in Humayun's reconquest of Hindustan.[4]

Following Humayun's death in 1556, Bairam Khan was appointed Regent over the young monarch Akbar. As regent, he consolidated Mughal authority in northern India and most notably led Mughal forces at the Second Battle of Panipat, which was fought between Akbar and the Hindu king Hemu in Nov. 1556.

Later years[edit]

Afghan at Patan, 1561, Akbarnama

Bairam Khan was a Shia muslim and was disliked by the Sunni Turkic nobles.[5] Bairam was dismissed from Akbar's service in 1560. He subsequently chose to leave India to perform the hajj pilgrimage inMecca.[6]

While travelling through Gujarat,[7] he was assassinated by Hazi Khan Mewati of Alwar, who was the General and close confidant of Hindu Kings of North India Hemu, and was staying at Patan after Akbar's forces captured Alwar Sarkar in 1559. One day when Bairam Khan was at Sahstraling Talav, a religious site, he was recognised by Lohani Pashtun an associate of Hazi Khan Mewati, whose father had been killed in Second Battle of Panipat (1556), five years ago, which was led by Bairam Khan. Hazi Khan attacked and killed Bairam Khan, to take the revenge of his father's death and due to jealousy towards him, being a Shia muslim. Bairam Khan died on 31 January 1561. However, his son and wife were allowed to go free and sent to north India. Bairam Khan's wife, who was also the cousin of Akbar, married Akbar after Bairam Khan's death and later on Bairam's son, Abdul Rahim Khan-i-khana, got an important assignment in Akbar's administration and was one of the 'Nau-rattans' (Nine Gems) of Akbar.

very true this was same thing told to me by my mother in law who is the descender of man singh family
bitblue thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: Donjas

It is already a blunder. I don't know of any war in which Bairam Khan fought against Maharana Pratap.The mughals were not involved in the Bundi war.
If I am wrong please guide me to any article on the internet so that my historical knowledge improves.


i have trust on CV they will not let pratap kill BK. yes mugals were not involve in bunid war but they did got defeated by rajputana in 1558 so looking at that fact CV took advantage proving pratap is grate 😆

i am saying this looking at fact from web.

The Mughal-Rajput War (1558-1578) was a conflict between the Mughal Empire of India and the local Hindu kings, the Rajputs.

Expansion into Central India

By 1559, the Mughals had launched a drive to the south into Rajputana and Malwa.[28] However, Akbar's disputes with his regent, Bairam Khan, temporarily put an end to the expansion.[28] The young emperor, at the age of eighteen, wanted to take a more active part in managing affairs. Urged on by his foster mother, Maham Anaga, and his relatives, Akbar decided to dispense with the services of Bairam Khan. After yet another dispute at court, Akbar finally dismissed Bairam Khan in the spring of 1560 and ordered him to leave on Hajj to Mecca.[29] Bairam Khan left for Mecca, but on his way was goaded by his opponents to rebel.[26] He was defeated by the Mughal army in the Punjab and forced to submit. Akbar, however forgave him and gave him the option of either continuing in his court or resuming his pilgrimage, of which Bairam chose the latter.[30] Bairam Khan was later assassinated on his way to Mecca, allegedly by an Afghan with a personal vendetta.[28] In 1560, Akbar resumed military operations.[28]

Edited by bitblue - 11 years ago
Donjas thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#8
Thanks Bitblue for the reply. Really appreciate it.
timepass thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#9
thanks ALL 😊
I had also read that Bairam Khan was assassinated by someone else...Pratap had nothing to do with BK or recent Bundi war...I don't understand what history books or historical reference CV's are using to show these episodes...

india4u thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#10
CVs are distorting historical facts. You must compromise the TRPs for the sake of facts. Many are watching the show. If you show the wrong facts many might believe the things shown in the serial are right. They must be very careful. I also don't understand the logic why can't they hire some historical scholars who are well versed with Mughal and Rajput era?
Anyway Thanks all for the information. 😊
Edited by shruthi87 - 11 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".