Were Jodha and Prtap related????

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Mini

@iMini

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#211

Originally posted by: Pari117

mewar was part of hindustan it was being ruled by someone who was hindustani.

ok,..i understand you don't support foreign invasion.see..whole of aryan sect are descendants of europeans..which fills up most of north india now.will you call them foreigners? no.
akbar was born in hindustan.so was humayun.but not babur.thats it.

Quote

714873

Hibernated

Posted: 12 years ago

#212

Originally posted by: Autumn_Rose

When it comes to the romance, showing rukayya as a narcissistic dumb bimbo, akbar looting temples (i bet they confused him with.. mohd. ghazni?), it's obviously fiction.

But akbar's political conquests and strategies shown are accurate. I'm in love with the show now.

i take show as mere fiction. But when we talk abt reality ruqaiya was not dat evil which ekta is showing and spoiling d great legend ruqaiya. So definately one can't expect genuineness in ekta's show

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

714873

Hibernated

Posted: 12 years ago

#213

Originally posted by: Mini.S
oh really?! who wrote that??? and how did akbar accept people writing this about him?!

you again asked another question which i can't corelate wid. But yes akbar didn't know to read and write. So courtiers wrote what he dictated. Autumn rose might be knowing dat akbar didn't know reading and writing.

Quote

Alakh

@Autumn_Rose

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

#214

Originally posted by: Pari117

just not autumnrose gave a link and extract. I could have pointed out that. Its just that whatever you are saying, i'm not able to corelate dat with d topic we are talking abt. As you brought india of today in comparison with mughal

My source of information isn't wrong I have read books that are referred for civil services examinations. although its from wiki, it is pretty authentic. I'm dead sure of that.

The link you have sent is anti-muslim.

You also mentioned that Nur jahan was remembered.. she was a cunning woman who knew how to use men's weaknesses.. There are many women like that who are remembered.. like hurram sultana.. a coccubine who eventually broke the 300 year old tradition, became a queen.. and her son ascended the throne

Interestingly, again in the same time period.. sulieman the magnificent.. who had good relations with Akbar

Quote

714873

Hibernated

Posted: 12 years ago

#215

Originally posted by: Autumn_Rose

They were outsiders, but they got mixed with us unlike the British.. much like the Aryan invasion. There is a difference.

its just like accepting autocrat willingly, but i can't accept outsiders ruling us. Why wasn't sonia gandhi made p.m. Though i think at it we must not have problem, even i'm fine wid it. But somewhere it still prevails in mass that she is outsider. Its common thinking we can't deny it

Quote

Mini

@iMini

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#216

Originally posted by: Pari117

you again asked another question which i can't corelate wid. But yes akbar didn't know to read and write. So courtiers wrote what he dictated. Autumn rose might be knowing dat akbar didn't know reading and writing.

well,even i know that.
you said akbar executed those who didn't write what he wished.i asked you for your source of this information.

Quote

Alakh

@Autumn_Rose

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

#217

Originally posted by: Pari117

you again asked another question which i can't corelate wid. But yes akbar didn't know to read and write. So courtiers wrote what he dictated. Autumn rose might be knowing dat akbar didn't know reading and writing.

He was probably dyslexic.. But had texts read out to him as a child, he could recite exact paragraphs from his memory only after hearing them once.😲

Quote

714873

Hibernated

Posted: 12 years ago

#218

Originally posted by: Mini.S
see pari,both you and i are intelligent enough to know this source of information isnt authentic ...just another site intolerant of islam

its just dat if i'll write abt myself i'll nva write bad, so does history is. Akbar courtiers can nva write wrong or rude deeds of him. But some hindu books of other reign mentions dat. So we can't blind ourselves without looking both sides of coin

Quote

Alakh

@Autumn_Rose

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

#219

Originally posted by: Pari117

its just like accepting autocrat willingly, but i can't accept outsiders ruling us. Why wasn't sonia gandhi made p.m. Though i think at it we must not have problem, even i'm fine wid it. But somewhere it still prevails in mass that she is outsider. Its common thinking we can't deny it

Because.. she doesn't want to be assassinated.. I remember TOI headlines very clearly when congress had won.. and the issue came up.. even though I was 11-12 years old..it read something like crown of thrones.. with images of barbed wire crown

Quote

714873

Hibernated

Posted: 12 years ago

#220

Originally posted by: Mini.S
ok,..i understand you don't support foreign invasion.see..whole of aryan sect are descendants of europeans..which fills up most of north india now.will you call them foreigners? no.
akbar was born in hindustan.so was humayun.but not babur.thats it.

yeah its rather good point, logical 👍🏼

Quote

1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 ... 28

Were Jodha and Prtap related???? - Page 22

Related Topics

Explore Topics