The could have's, the should have's and the that already has happened.
I have been asked time again as to how and why I happen to be a neutral viewer when it came to Beyhadh and what makes one think neutrally without forming any sort of bias whatsoever and thus, I opened this topic to share the approach I think works well.
Before I begin, I strongly urge and even strongly recommend you to please read FleetingWishes's post on page 1 of The firewall between the light and the darkness including my 3 main posts. Because if what she said/explained and the way she did it doesn't somehow make sense to you then I'm going to say now has even lesser chances of making sense to you. 😆
Any show, any book, any movie, basically any form of art or literature comes with the following amongst other the things that hold significance :
- A set universe.
- A definite set of rules, functions, parameters and boundaries.
- The creator or writers vision.
Now, allow me to list Beyhadh's pro's and con's.
Con's :
- The tone of the show. (What exactly is it? Love story? Romantic thriller? Or both? Or none? Or something else)
- Characterization, development and progression of characters (Particularly, Arjun. He's rarely every anything more than a plot device.)
- Execution of tracks or plots. (They do have good tracks but the execution heavily relies on prophesies and the superstitious, spiritual, religious or Ex Machina elements)
Pro's :
- Still a piece of fictional television show which aims at and tries to offer a relatively new, fresh and original content.
- Brilliant performers/star cast in the form of Jennifer Winget and Aneri Vajani. (Kushal is decent and other supporting cast does well but no one can deny that Jennifer and Aneri are definitely the one's who stand out the most)
Now, what you need to understand about any show, book or movie you watch. Case in point, Beyhadh.
- You have all the right to critique, judge and study the show as you deem fit. Having said that, remember that the writer reserves the right to creative liberty. Sure, most of the shows abuse this liberty to an unacceptable level and dish out trash in the name of good entertainment, including Beyhadh. 😳 However, we still can't and we still shouldn't coerce the writers to divert the show's direction other in what direction they want it to go in. Because? It is at the end of the day, their product.
- If there is any piece of art or fiction, whether visual or written that you cannot connect to, that does not make sense to you using any logic, technique or perspective under the sun, please do yourselves a favour and do not watch it. You have every right to and you surely can express your displeasure, distaste, disappointment, disagreement and condemnation if need be. Once you have done that, let the show be. You move on and watch something that genuinely interests you and keeps you happy as a reader/viewer. If the show caters to the masses, it will have a successful run. If it doesn't, it'll die out. If it runs, their luck and if it doesn't, you get to relish the sadistic pleasure. 😆
For instance, let's consider Harry Potter series (JKR, I deeply apologize, my Queen that I have to use HP as a reference to explain certain things about Beyhadh. Mujhe maaf kar dena iss gushtakhi ke liye. 😠But since there's no better reference I could think of at the moment, HP comes as a savior to me, as it always did. <3)
Harry Potter books are set in a universe magical universe. Magic, fantasy, supernatural, unseen, unknown, all of it. Supposing, I'm the kind who just doesn't believe in magic, I'll be like, aye ja bey ja, yeh magic wagic kuch nahi hota real life mein. Sab bekaar ki baatien hai, kya bakwaas hai yeh?' Would I be ever able to understand the GENIUS JK Rowling is and the MAGIC the books/movies were and will continue to be so for as long as there's life on earth. The answer is straight out, NO. I'd remain in my own bubble devoid of the geniusly phenomenal piece of work HP was.
Now, Beyhadh is no Harry Potter. NO AT ALL. Not in any capacity or space. SHEESH NO. HELL NO. 😳 But what I meant to lay emphasis on was in Beyhadh's universe, prophesies, predictions, warnings, signs, etc play a HUGE role and are a part of its existence. So, that leaves you and I no choice but to take them into consideration and not question its logicality or credibility even though you and I don't believe in it at all. Whether or not, it's a real practice in reality and whether or not, we consider it valid or acceptable is inconsequential because what we think doesn't make a difference to the story.
The parameters I use to study/analyze/critique the characters or their intentions/deeds with respect to what has already happened or is going to happen are as follows.
That which has already happened : Take Maya locking herself up at the sight of trouble at her wedding.
The could have : The Maya we have seen till date has shown that she's extremely capable of turning a situation or an event in favour even under dire circumstances. She easily could have handled the situation by taking Vandana aside and sorting it out. She could have easily explained Vandana her side of the story (personally, face to face, one on one talk) and ask her to give her once chance. Something that she ideally should have done EONS ago.
The should have : The should have basically is a viewer's version of what should have happened or what a certain character should have said or done in a particular situation. In this case, my should have matches with the could have.
And now,
The why it couldn't have : Considering the above three parameters, I completely get why Maya just ran from the situation to lock herself up after a dialogue or two. She was a bride to be, she had dreams and hopes of starting afresh, she was looking forward to all the love and happiness she was deprived of so long, she had hopes of happiness and peace, she was just an inch away from getting both her junoon and her sukoon. But what happened was the exact opposite of what she wanted. Her worst fears turned into a reality rearing it's ugly head in her face. She was yet again faced with fear, scepticism, doubtful and questionable faces, her traumatic and ugly past which she had almost left behind came rushing back to her like a bullet fast train of horrible memories she had almost forgotten. She couldn't think of anything else but to just escape into solitude and cry her heart out.
THAT is precisely how I see through any character. I only judge when I feel there's a need to otherwise, my attention is mostly focused on why a character is the way he/she is, why is he/she doing what he/she is doing, what makes him/her to be him/her, what makes them who they essentially are. I'd give out more examples on Arjun, Saanjh, Vandana or any other character but since Maya sabki favourite hai, I picked her up. 😆
If I go, arre isne aisa kyun kiya? Usse aisa karna chahiye tha. Isne aise kyun kaha, usse aise kehna chahiye tha. Woh aise kaisa kar sakti hai? Usko yeh nahi karna chahiye tha', etc. Then, I'd instead just go to the writer, snatch the paper and pen away from him and say,
'Bhai, tu rehne de. Tujhse nahi hoga. Main hi kar leti hoon'.
In this case, I don't doubt most of us could write the show better but ab jo hone se raha aur jo hone wala nahi uska soch ke kya faida. It's always better to go, Saanu ki fark painda hai?' or let me just write/discuss/rant away and be at peace with it'.
Now, I might go hibernate for a couple of years as the amount of writing I have done for the last 3-4 topics have almost given me ungliyon ka sarr dard. 😳 Ab yeh mat puchna ke fingers mein headache kaise hota hai? Yeh kya logic hai?
Edited : The terms 'you', 'you and I', 'us', 'we', viewers', 'audience', etc are a general figure of speech. GENERAL. 'You' isn't meant as or directed towards any person or fan group. Be assured. This post is ENTIRELY, COMPLETELY, TOTALLY and THOROUGHLY my approach of reading or watching a piece of fiction.