Not The Same

Bandini has changed . It is not the same The subtlety and decorum has given way to crass. What is this constant discussion of Santu and Dharamraj having a child. He is old enough to be a grandpa and is on the way to become one and Santu is younger than his own daughter. Please stop all this. Try and rise above the waist. Don't let your standard fall so much. You are giving wrong signals and setting a bad example to society. Lagna na geet lagne gavaay meanig you sing wedding songs at weddings not out of turn. Come on Ba BApu Motiben Rasik Meghna Saumilbhai Nanji explain to Dharamraj I don't look forward to Bandini any more. The creatives could have brought about twists without this constant discussion about Dharamraj producing a kid at this age .

I have a slightly different opinion here.

Originally posted by: sumiko

Bandini has changed . It is not the same The subtlety and decorum has given way to crass. What is this constant discussion of Santu and Dharamraj having a child. He is old enough to be a grandpa and is on the way to become one and Santu is younger than his own daughter. Please stop all this. Try and rise above the waist. Don't let your standard fall so much. You are giving wrong signals and setting a bad example to society. Lagna na geet lagne gavaay meanig you sing wedding songs at weddings not out of turn. Come on Ba BApu Motiben Rasik Meghna Saumilbhai Nanji explain to Dharamraj I don't look forward to Bandini any more. The creatives could have brought about twists without this constant discussion about Dharamraj producing a kid at this age .

Although I agree that Bandini has changed....it is losing it's simplicity....it was supposed to be a simple story about how a mismatched couple change an unwanted relationship into an unbreakable bond....and not about murder and mayhem. But I don't agree with the rest of the statement. Santu and DM are a married couple, in love with each other and in natural progression of things, children come next and it doesn't matter how old they are or how many kids/grandkids either of them have.....if they decide to have a child, I don't see any problem with that and it is no one's business but theirs and nobody should be bothered by it......if DM's family(most of them anyways) has wholeheartedly accepted DM and Santu's relationship, I see no problem in any of then having problems with them having kids, they should have expected it.

We don't need to go to the western world, it happens even in India and not only in rural society.....lets take the example of Bollywood -- Salman Khan in his 40s is dating Katrina who is in her 20s, Aamir Khan married someone much younger. And these are actors who are pretty close to DM's age, so is RR for that matter, we don't call them old....I really don't understand this fixation with DM's age and why people don't expect him to have a regular marriage because of it.

I agree on the part of how the show no longer holds the essence of its originality.

Nowadays 50 is considered young and there is absolutely nothing wrong with having a baby at this age especially for a man. Santu is young and she should have her own child if they both wish it. Older men have babies in India especially if they marry for the second time which is also the case for DM. So all things considered, SanRaj has the ok from most of us.

Originally posted by: Khalrika

Thanks Chalia for the wonderful reply. I have something to say too. People over 40 are not "old." 80 is old and not 50. I do not know how it is in India but in the western world, where I live, it is A-ok for people to marry late (yes even older men marrying much younger women). Heck, Clint Eastwood married at over 65 to a woman in her 20s or something like that and he had children with her. Why, even women marry younger men and have children. Look at Demi Moore! She was 42 when she got married to Aston Kutcher was 27!!!!!!

Personally, I don't think there is anything to be ashamed of if an man and a woman (over the legal age limit) decide to have a consensual physical relationship. Santu and D are husband and wife, above the age limit, and are having a physical relationship after mutual consent. What is there to be ashamed of in a husband and wife having a physical relationship and wanting to have children? I think it is time to come into the 21 century.

50 is still prime age for a man in my opinion, and DM is totally prime😉

Originally posted by: Mallika113

50 is still prime age for a man in my opinion, and DM is totally prime😉

I like the wink!