Fools rush in where angels fear to tread

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

731627

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

#21

Is not jagya shown helpless that .why he shown helplesss in front of anandi that he dont know how to stop child marriage as mouni baba influence public .i think anandi take risk because jagya andpolice show helpless

Edited by surabhi01 - 9 years ago

Quote

Rashmi

@goofyCat

Sparkler

Posted: 9 years ago

#22

Originally posted by: SPuja
There is a huge difference between what soldiers or firefighters do and what anandi has done. Even Shiv and Anandi's deed were so different - Shiv never put other's at risk while Anandi's foolishness had played havoc in other's life also.

I don't think I have written that both are exactly similar, its quite clear from my post. I am just looking at the intentions behind the person's action in both situations. Anyone who is not willing to risk their life obviously will not choose to be a soldier or firefighter. Everyone has a different perception for the same situation, Anandi's ability to sacrifice her own interests for others in such situations is what I admire about her. It doesn't make her fool in my view as long as it doesn't turn the situation messier because of her.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

#23

Anandi went in because it was easy for her to slip in and slip out.

When she stumbled upon an important piece of evidence she had two choices.Either inform police and Jagya or gather what ever information she could on Akheraj.

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

#24

in this case also anandi has option 2 go out & tell abt it 2 oders. but she stopped & barged in. she cud'd recorded convo of Ak wid kavita etc.

jagya din't ask he r 2 barge in .he asked her 2 go in disguise 2 see & tell abt the situtn.ystrday i cud only watched this scene properly & i also thot anandi was not just foolish but stupid also.

Edited by tiny15 - 9 years ago

Quote

hisusmita

@hisusmita

Sparkler

Posted: 9 years ago

#25

Originally posted by: russhmeSS
Some look at it as fools rushing in. While some look at it as putting others welfare above your own interests, even own life. Its just the difference of how one looks at things.

Don't soldiers put their life at risk while fighting enemies? Don't firefighters put their life at risk while saving people's lives? Ofcourse someone's ways are more logical and well planned while someone's are not, the situations can be different, but the intention is equally noble and pure.

Both husband and wife were very much alike in a way, they never thought about themselves when they saw others suffering.. No wonder they made a perfect couple.

Don't want to compare Shiv's ways with Anandi's ways here because Shiv being a trained IAS officer very well knew how to handle emergency situations. But the intention with which they both jumped into situations was exactly same.

👏 very well said Rushmee.
Its how you look at a situation, a character😃

Quote

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

#26

Originally posted by: russhmeSS

I don't think I have written that both are exactly similar, its quite clear from my post. I am just looking at the intentions behind the person's action in both situations. Anyone who is not willing to risk their life obviously will not choose to be a soldier or firefighter. Everyone has a different perception for the same situation, Anandi's ability to sacrifice her own interests for others in such situations is what I admire about her. It doesn't make her fool in my view as long as it doesn't turn the situation messier because of her.

Well said.Soldiers and fire fighters are aware of the dangers involved and yet joined these services. They may have been trained to tackle these situations but they are doing the kind of work because of the high level of work satisfaction they get from it apart from salaries. If they are not prepared for the risks involved they wouldn't be in this line of work.

Whether Anandi lost her child because she was foolish or Akheraj is a dangerous man idepends on how one looks at the situation.

The point is everyone is faced with two choices in circumstances like these

Anandi took a risk banking on police protection all those years ago and that risk didn't pay off

Now she is only putting her life at risk to save a child who is under her care.

The phone rang when it was inconvenient but nobody was hurt in the process except Anandi herself.

The child's life is at risk because of the groom and Akheraj and not because of Anandi.

Dsa was more disturbed by the phone call she made to Jagya.Anandi didn't put either her kids or Dsa at risk this time.

There is a difference between taking a risk for the heck and putting one's life at risk for the benefit of the society.

Quote

hisusmita

@hisusmita

Sparkler

Posted: 9 years ago

#27

As if CVs showed what J told her to do😆

I too flip channels and watch but I watch the whole episode.😆

No plan was shown.

It was shown she went inside. When she realized he is Akhi she turned back to inform police and J

Then she was telling herself that the crowed is under babaji's spell so unless she collects evidence no one will believe her.

Even if he goes back to J and Akhi what they would have done?

The crowed didnt allow them to go inside even. They were standing like helpless and Anandi thn A went their in disguise as a part of their plan.

So she was recording the evidence.

She came inside and was talking to Akhi so that Akhi himself say all his sins which were being recorded.
But she was stupid only not to put the phone in silent mode which can happen too in haste.

It was not that, they sat at home and did the planing. They just decided there, she changed her costume. May be she missed it and DS out of her love called up

Anyways everything depends on how you look at a character

Both Anandi and Shiv , they think alike, they keep others problem above theirs.

Situations are different so result can be different BUT Intention was same. Both of them are selfless and thinks about others.

Edited by hisusmita - 9 years ago

Quote

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

#28

Anandi had two choices whether to go and tell Jagya and party about Akheraj or collect evidence against him and then go.

She chose the latter.

Shiv had a choice to look after the safety of the crowds or handle that terrorist by himself. He chose the latter

Mangala had an option to get Akheraj to give the baby to her or are get the baby married to Kundan.She chose latter.

When people have make choices in the nick of time it is only their instincts which will help them make those choices.

Shiv and Anandi both are agrressive when it comes to dealing with anti social elements and they chose to tackle them.

Whether they are foolish or whether it is their intolerance for people like terrorists and monsters like Akheraj depends on how one looks at them.

Anandi would have continued to record the whole thing quietly but the man started abusing the child and she had to barge in. She managed to divert the attention from the child to herself since that's the only way to protect the child.

Had she not barged in who knows what Akheraj would have done to the child?

Who knows whether Jagya and party would reach in time or not?

Quote

Missesha

@Missesha

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#29

It was a lamely executed episode:

For 15 plus years, Anandi had been officially spreading awareness about ill effects of bal vivah in Jaitser, but strangely, all villagers suddenly lost their thinking caps, and chose to support bal vivah / mouni baba.

Anandi doesn't have any rescue / support team in their organisation. She is whole and soul and that too unarmed / unprotected.

Anandi's back up is only Jagya.

Jagya and Anandi had no back up plan or signals to track, what if Anandi faced difficulties while confronting Mouni baba or while saving Kavita (Common sense is always missing).