Mixed signals - Page 20

I am much more dense and stupid.

Originally posted by: SPuja

Doctors don't keep a patient alive because of relatives, they do so because all right thinking people are pro-life. That's why people save others even when they are not under any obligation to do so. The example of Aruna Shaunbagh shows that it's not just relatives for whom doctors keep the patient alive, even court justified the action.

It is not the doctors but the nurses who kept Aruna alive. Indeed some doctor even tried to hush up some report . Even the nurses kept her alive because she was one of them.

Not all doctors are pro life.

They are forced to keep the patient alive despite no hope because of the relatives too especially in case of young and terminally ill patients

And we cannot generalise that only pro life vadis are right thinking people. If someone differs, there must be some reason for it and that person cannot become wrong thinking just because of that.

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

It is not the doctors but the nurses who kept Aruna alive. Indeed some doctor even tried to hush up some report . Even the nurses kept her alive because she was one of them.

Not all doctors are pro life.

Aruna Shaunbaug was not allowed to die with dignity. Her relatives had abandoned her, they were helpless, and it became a matter of pride for the nurses community to keep her alive.
Her life was a living hell. Could these so called right thinking people connect with her pain?

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

How defence changes?

First it was tomtommed that Mangala did not trust and she feared something bad will happen to Nimboli if she was taken away.

Now her intentions have become known, the defence is that selfishness is ok.😆

Now she has become righteous, thinking, introspective. Her introspectiveness about possessing Nimboli has prevented her from doing something for that girl. Her righteousness, her helpfulness will not coverup her ignoring law, ignoring help from others just to keep Nimboli for herself as if she is a toy.

Her intentions were always clear - she loved that kid. There is no denial. But yes she is not selfish and she does not savour someone's child.

Originally posted by: tellygeek

Aruna Shaunbaug was not allowed to die with dignity. Her relatives had abandoned her, they were helpless, and it became a matter of pride for the nurses community to keep her alive.
Her life was a living hell. Could these so called right thinking people connect with her pain?

Mangala's story is being narrated nicely and this character is evolving extremely well.
Is Mangala's love selfish ? Yes and No.
She is Nandini's saviour and gradually became a mother figure. She is kind, has strong maternal instincts.
But does she truly love her ? Then how can she watch her slogging day and night like a bonded laborer, or getting beaten black and blue by Harki or Akhiraj? or getting humiliated every moment she is awake till date.
Would she have tolerated this if Nandini was her own child?
No, Nandini has been her solace, and became her reason for living. But what about Nandini ? What will be her future with Mangala? Good, as time progresses, Mangala is realizing it. This track is damn interesting.
The actor is a pleasure to watch.

Originally posted by: tellygeek

Mangala's story is being narrated nicely and this character is evolving extremely well.
Is Mangala's love selfish ? Yes and No.
She is Nandini's saviour and gradually became a mother figure. She is kind, has strong maternal instincts.
But does she truly love her ? Then how can she watch her slogging day and night like a bonded laborer, or getting beaten black and blue by Harki or Akhiraj? or getting humiliated every moment she is awake till date.
Would she have tolerated this if Nandini was her own child?
No, Nandini has been her solace, and became her reason for living. But what about Nandini ? What will be her future with Mangala? Good, as time progresses, Mangala is realizing it. This track is damn interesting.
The actor is a pleasure to watch.

Originally posted by: tellygeek

Mangala's story is being narrated nicely and this character is evolving extremely well.
Is Mangala's love selfish ? Yes and No.
She is Nandini's saviour and gradually became a mother figure. She is kind, has strong maternal instincts.
But does she truly love her ? Then how can she watch her slogging day and night like a bonded laborer, or getting beaten black and blue by Harki or Akhiraj? or getting humiliated every moment she is awake till date.
Would she have tolerated this if Nandini was her own child?
No, Nandini has been her solace, and became her reason for living. But what about Nandini ? What will be her future with Mangala? Good, as time progresses, Mangala is realizing it. This track is damn interesting.
The actor is a pleasure to watch.

Very well said vijaya

U put it so nicely in few words