BV super episode WU - 25/2/2012

An excellent episode with good finesse. Of the few characters who are getting written consistently well, whether in grey or positive shades, Dsa shines brilliant. And has always been cynosure of the show, absolutely brought to a vivid life with Surekhaji's cogent virtuosity.
Bhairav correctly reminded everyone about past mistakes. Gehna-Anandi's mutual reflections aptly spoke a point. Hope Cvs won't backtrack on their repented Gehna and keep her level head that she's always been, except for a brief period- so inconsistent- whatever the explanations (be it blind parental love or slighted parental role).
Dsa knitted all loose ends well and resolved the crisis from the root. Satisfying script. These show power of the narrative, which Cvs are capable of or can exercise if they choose.
These said, I notice some untoward and sardonic references to the past critiques on the course of the narrative, which are undeserved and unnecessary, for; 1.) The critiques were expressed as the individual interpretation/analysis of a particular fictional track as the way it was presented at that time, no matter how it is coursed to an eventual correction. But the sarcastic references on a member's past critiques, with a convenient advantage of an eventual correction, are trespasses on a 'real' member's views, not a fictional track. 2.) I enjoy and support any good correction in the tale. But that does not take away the unpleasantness that may have crept in by the way of inconsistent or scratched privilege of a writer's creative licence in between. These can be argued or stretched subjectively, however no appetite for iterative arguments here...would only request a refrain.

Originally posted by: asru

Thanks for the update Khushi!

Im glad that this drama ended finally emphasizing on DS's true change of character. She is one woman who lives for the family and still she neither flipped during G's pregnancy track or during Basant's panchayat track which indicates her genuinity!

Through her outstanding patience Anandi has achieved real big things in life changing people like DS for the good. Anandi dedicates her life for the Singh's and they too support her ceaselessly!

Originally posted by: stutishah

These said, I notice some untoward and sardonic references to the past critiques on the course of the narrative, which are undeserved and unnecessary, for; 1.) The critiques were expressed as the individual interpretation/analysis of a particular fictional track as the way it was presented at that time, no matter how it is coursed to an eventual correction. But the sarcastic references on a member's past critiques, with a convenient advantage of an eventual correction, are trespasses on a 'real' member's views, not a fictional track. 2.) I enjoy and support any good correction in the tale. But that does not take away the unpleasantness that may have crept in by the way of inconsistent or scratched privilege of a writer's creative licence in between. These can be argued or stretched subjectively, however no appetite for iterative arguments here...would only request a refrain.