Her commitment to benevolent patriarchy is so so strong!!! Ham use "traumatized" samjhte rahe. Ham usse slowly grow karte dekhna chahte the. Ham use khush dekhna chahte the. She doesn't have psychotic problem where she genuinely lacks the capacity to understand the reality. She is the damn believer. A believer whose belief system is shitty. She herself never thought/felt she has been abused. Usko sirf EMA ka aur thoda bahut neglect hone ka dard hai, jisne usne apni "mahanta" se aur apne dushman ka hriday parivartan karke jeet liya hai. She is eternally committed to Shahs. To give "validity" to her transgressions, she simply invented meaning in it. She started to call Baa & Baapuji as Maata-Pita. Naa kisi Dharm ke hisaab se, naa modern science, psychological and philosophical angle se.. wo uske Maata Pita ho sakte hain.
Yaha tak ki regressive religious books tak ye kah jaat hain ki agar Maata Pita (sachmuch ke) bachhe ke prati apna dharm na nibhaye to wo Maata Pita nahi rah jate. To aise "man ka rishta" kahkar justify karna, jabki saamne Wale ke paas "man" hai hi nahi.
Makers ye saari kahani Anupamaa ko ideological level par "sahi" proof karne, Lady Bhagat Singh banakar dikha rahe hain. Ye kahani Trauma ke impact par nahi hai. Ye women empowerment ki story thi hi nahi.
Ye to regressive upper caste/class ke logo ki social understanding and unka apna judgment hai. Through this they're speaking to regular women and encouraging them to accept their abuse and serve their masters without questioning them. They come with this toxic positive attitude ki "ham apni positivity se sabko badal dalenge! Ki achha achha sochne aur aankh band rakhne se sab thik ho jata hai!
Ye log "ignorance is bliss" wali mentality par chal rahe. Modern healthcare sirf inko Vannu/Doshu ke case me yaad aata hai. Unke crime ko "mental illness" ghoshit krne me lage rahte hain. Anyway.
Achha hua ki ab jyada se jyada log ye sab samjh paa rahe. Kaiyon ka moh bhang hua hai.
To be honest my great grand mom is not much educated just like anupama 10th pass
But neither her husband or in law or kids or grand kids can dare behave like shahs do to anupama or all will get slapped and kicked out in first minute by her
sorry to say but this is not correct potrayal of indian women
women are not like anupama at all even those born in 1930s and 1940s forget later
Every woman even those born in 1930s and 40s knows whats ause and would handle in laws and husband very welll even in 1950s and now
Anupama is rare case who keeps liking her abusers and thinking of their well being
And honestly no ones regressive nature can be changed what you think from childhood or till 21 years stay with you for life that character does not change
Anupama too will never change she may mask her regressive behaviour somtime to gain anuj trust but i do not think in this life anupama will become modern thinking and stop going to her abusers
Imagine you are given King crown but want to behave like a servant with shahs nothing can change you
That means you do not deserve the king post in first place
She will always have that patrichilal submissive attitude with shahs
With kapadiyas its diff matter she will abuse them or leave them based on her whims
But i have realized anupama will never chagnge towards shahs till death she will be same using anuj money to pls them and making anuj and CA bend to them all life till her death
1