Originally posted by: Paru...
Kavya just said Vanraj called Anuj to meet at this hilly place. she is not a witness of this mishap.After the accident V couldn't recollect what actually happened at the cliff.But he was sure about the fact he had no purpose to kill or hurt Anuj.So after Ak came out of coma V wanted to hear the truth from Ak's mouth and Ak admitted that it was just an accident.
I have seen worse people in the show than Baa. According to me BB,M ,MD and to some extend V are worse people than Baa.
Kavya follows Vanraj to the cliff. She see the two arguing and the fight escalating.
Vanraj had no intentions to kill, ofcourse, why kill when you can torture him enough. He chose the cliff to just get a bird's eye view or measure the height of the cliff and depth of the trench.
Ok let me ask this question, he had no intention to harm Anuj. Would he be blamed if Anuj never came out of coma or if he had died?
Just for the record, aiding a crime is also a crime.
The bottomline here is, despite there being confession and witness, Anupama in her extreme grief chose to believe Vanraj. Such is her belief in her ex-relation, something that she so easily gave up in Anuj's case.
@bold: Please elaborate. Who is M?
Barkha wants money. She won't kill for money. Money can be earned.
Ok, fed up prolonged verbal abuse, if anyone were to take extreme steps, would Leela then be responsible. I mean as far as I can see from the replies, as long as the person is medically alive, it is no crime, right? Coma or not.
Just one more point, abetment to suicide is a punishable offence and Leela's taunts as put out and verbal abuse that it actually is, can be a cause of such abetment.
What Samar did was heroic, no doubt. No one deserves it.
Finally, kisi ki jaan nahin gayi iska matlab yeh toh nahin na ki Jeevan hi narak bana de.
Edited by Bodhianveshika - 1 years ago
9