Bacha najayaz nahi hota!

As much as I agree to this statement, why is it necessary for Barkha to accept Romil and Vanraj to accept Kavya's baby, according to Anupama?

They might be most selfish and vile ppl, but they don't deserve this forceful acceptance of kids being the result of their spouse's infidelity.

But eventually these two will after time and again lecture by Anupama.. But my question is why? It would set a wrong example, what's this with dkp shows these days?

Both yrkkh and Anupama are just going downhill with no proper meaningful writing of characters.

To aur koi story bachi nahi to yeh writer log ke pass masoom movie ki story follow Kar Rahe Hain

Any way Sara will accept romil brother

Ye rishta toh phir bhi understood hai its been running from a decade so story line is takin a toll I mean xhaution bt Shitmaaaa is toh abhi ka nd having a social issue kind of thing so why

Dont know why the hell writers are behind EMA...

It's boring as hell.

Look who's talking about accepting another person's child? She legally fostered CA but could never accept her and we know all the drama that ensued.

Originally posted by: inlieu

Look who's talking about accepting another person's child? She legally fostered CA but could never accept her and we know all the drama that ensued.

Exactly my point, she couldn't accept infidelity and is expecting Barkha and Vanraj to accept not only infidelity but the kid due to that

Originally posted by: --Ruchi--

Dont know why the hell writers are behind EMA...

It's boring as hell.

I mean so true it's so boring and regressive, what's progressive I don't know which makers and maa claim

What's are writer teaching audience with this crap ??

So barkha and vanraj will marry each other as both going through same pain

Originally posted by: --Ruchi--

Dont know why the hell writers are behind EMA...

It's boring as hell.

Lagta hai kuch personal issue hai makers ka EMA ke saath. 😛

Rajan Shahi ki koi ex hogi.

😆