Kavya, Rakhi and Paritosh aren’t Bad

There’s a story in Ramayana..

Where Ram tells Lakshman, If you like Bharata, praise him as much as you want but to glorify his qualities, you don’t need to berate mother Keyka..

In the same way, there is no need to stamp Kavya as a “Vamp” to show Anupama as “Heroine”.

1. It is Kavya who encouraged Anupama to take up the “Teacher’s Job” which helped Anupama to have some confidence in herself.. She told Vanraj not to be a Mean husband.

2. Kavya, on multiple occasions told Vanraj that she doesn’t hate Anupama and don’t mind to be her friend.

3. The behaviour of Kavya towards Anupama changed when Vanraj started ignoring Kavya for Anupama and showing little to no interest in marrying her.
She became insecure and developed desperation to show everyone that she is better than Anupama.

4. Kavya doesn’t have any issues with anybody.. The one and only problem with Kavya is, she wants to be the centre of attention and she wants everybody to love her more than anybody.. be it Anupama or Pakhi..

I personally don’t find Kavya, Rakhi and Paritosh as Bad or Mean like Vanraj or Baa.

Infact I felt bad when Kinjal didn’t move from her place when Rakhi tripped on stepping a Pearl. Usually, children run to their parents to support if they are falling down irrespective of the situation. She didn’t even confronted Anupama on how can she stop a mother from meeting her daughter.

At the end, everything Rakhi does is for Kinjal and Kinjal too is aware of that.. which mother feels better to leave her daughter in such a dysfunctional family.

So, I don’t understand why few people wanted Anuj to insult or teach a lesson to Rakhi..

Paritosh spoke the truth about everyone at the time of his outburst (apart from insulting his mother)

I find Vanraj, Baa and Bapuji worse than Kavya, Rakhi and Paritosh.

Yes, I find Bapuji worse even though he is on Anupama’s side cos.. He is the only person who holds an authority to correct or control Vanraj and Baa as a head of the family but he never did it, hence I dislike him.

They aren't bad and are much better than Leela and Vanraj, won't deny that factor.

Even yesterday, Kavya tried to explain the logistics to Vanraj to stop investing his energy on Anupama & focus on how the cafe can profit. She also partook in it to see because Vanraj was involved. From her perspective, she's trying to seek a job opportunity because self-doubt kicked in.

For me, Anu's character arc is a bit unrealistic and vexing at times in the way it was delivered in the episodes with passing time, considering her workload and the atmosphere in the Shah house is also way too linear for someone to even evolve in. I get that her evolution is imperative to the track but certain things just truly boggle my mind, lol. What are other members really doing in the house? lol

Sometimes, it could just be the 'general mindset' or unidimensional mindset that might block the mind from observing the perspective.

Even I find Anupama’s character unrealistic..

How can she tolerate Baa who taunts her 24*7?

Why don’t she give it back to her atleast once?

She goes to school, manages dance academy, cooks and does household chores and also have time to think and plan about Hotel Project... Is she a superwoman??

I

From day one rakhi find ways to demean Anu for no good reason , she wanted to demean anu coz she is less educated is it very right .

I don't really hate rakhi but yes I definitely want AK to teach rakhi a lesson who think if they have money then they can insult others for their entertainment . Rakhi had questioned anu's character , who gave her this right , in future I m sure she will instigate people against maan relationship for her own entertainment, infact she has started doing it she saw leela vanraj getting affected so started teasing them.

Rakhi hates anu coz Kinjal prefer Anu over her , it's not anu 's fault , it's rakhi who failed to give Kinjal that motherly love that Kinjal started looking in Anu .

Yes rakhi is right in thinking about Kinjal betterment but it's don't give her right to insult others. Rakhi wanted to destroy shah family coz Kinjal refuse to move away , where is anu wrong here if Kinjal is not ready to go .

If Anuj wanted he would had insulted vanraj & shah family more but he don't want to waste his time or give them importance.

Anupama kitna bhi bewakoof or unrealistic kyu na ho still it don't give anyone right to insult her .

Yes anu was wrong in restricting rakhi to meet Kinjal or that slapping d cheque on her face & gangajal Anu was definitely wrong but there r many times when rakhi had humiliated Anu with no fault of her .

Rakhi's nonsense cannot be justified under ma ka pyar coz she never tried to know why Kinjal don't warm up to her or choose anu above her .

Jaha Anupama galat hai vaha galat hai lekin Kinjal rakhi ke issue mein anu ki koi galti nhi hai.

Rakhi didn't start demeaning Anu over nothing. Anu herself was living a demeaning life, & others only treat you based off the image you project. There are many people who aren't graduates & yet command respect. The left Anu lives.. She doesn't respect herself, never taught her kids to respect her, never demanded respect from her family.. Then why would a stranger place you on a pedestal? Any successful, self-respecting mother would be horrified at the thought of marrying her daughter off to a family like Shah's.. Where her MIL happily lives as a slave.

Rakhi has many times expressed that she thinks Anu is a good human being with a lot of love in her heart. But she doesn't respect her because Anu is dumb AF & a damn doormat.

I guess in comparison.. Kavya, Rakhi and Paritosh are not that bad compared to Baa for me

But I feel somewhere there is the problem with ITV writers. (Although I can understand them... I feel pity for them... Still..)

All the characters have fluctuating personalities that anyone would get confused... oh sorry... everyone except Anupama

This is especially clear with Rakhi. who at sometimes is shown as a mean sadistic person who enjoys seeing others misfortune.. but then gets emotionally close to shahs and even went out of her ways to help them many times.

Same for Kavya... She is shown as selfish yet practical person.. definitely not an owner of a great personality but not a vamp in typical sense.. I guess she would have been much more comfortable if Anupama and Vanraj did not share the same house after divorce (please blame Bapuji and writers for that)

Only character who did not (and i know... will not ) change is Baa.. who loves herself and then her son and then her daughter... Oh and Anupama(Maaaaa)

All other characters are fluctuating personalities... which makes difficult for me to connect with the show emotionally.

Why should Anuj teach a lesson to anybody?

Rakhi and Kavya are blessing in disguise for Anupama.. Kavya gave Anupama freedom from her toxic relationship.
If Rakhi demeaned Anupama, she also helped her and Shah’s many a times.
Anupama insulted Rakhi very badly and also slapped Kavya in past episodes.. So, Anupama is no Abla Naari..

Who is Anuj and why should he teach lesson to everybody who humiliates Anupama?

Anupama should grow a spine, be successful and give back to people who insults her and she is capable of that.

We women doesn’t need a Man to protect us or take revenge on behalf of us.

Lastly, It’s Anupama who let everybody to walk over her.

Yesterday i made comment about this

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/post/159082162

I find rakhi bad because rakhi Uncesssarry insult anupama

And regarding toshu speaking truth i find it hilarious where was such truth for so many year when when vanraj pakhi and leela doing bad for so many year

Yeh jo toshu jub baat iske upar aati hai tabhi isko sach bolne ka bhoot sawar hota hai

Jaise jub vanraj ne jub yeh kaha ki toshu ki shaadi se kinjal se nahin hogi tub toshu ji drunk haalat mein sach bola

Aur isi tarah jub vanraj ne oppose toshu ka rakhi ke pent house mein jaane ko tabhi. Toshu ka sach yaad aaya

Yeh toshu ji sach tabhi bolte hai jub baat toshu ke favour mein nahin hoti hai

Otherwise i have never seen toshu speaking truth. Sach bolne ka shauk hai to. Aisi hi sach bolo na why only speake Truth at that time only when. Condition is not favour in toshu aur yeh toshu apne baare mein bhi sach bole.

Jub toshu khud leela vanraj jaisa hai to usme mooh se sach sunkar hasi aati hai

Originally posted by: surabhi01

Yesterday i made comment about this

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/post/159082162

I find rakhi bad because rakhi Uncesssarry insult anupama

If Rakhi is that bad, Anupama aadhi raat ko help maangne Nahi jaati Rakhi ke ghar and Rakhi did helped Anupama and Shah’s multiple times

And regarding toshu speaking truth i find it hilarious where was such truth for so many year when when vanraj pakhi and leela doing bad for so many year

Har cheez ka ek saturation point hoti hai.. when ppl cross it, tabhi baat karte hai koi bhi.. He was so frustrated that he couldn’t hold back and spoke. And why should Toshu speak on behalf of Anupama, when Anupama herself doesn’t feel that Vanraj and Baa are bullying her, insulting her..

Yeh jo toshu jub baat iske upar aati hai tabhi isko sach bolne ka bhoot sawar hota hai

Haan.. what’s wrong in that.. Baat humare upar aati hai toh hum baat karengey na??

Jaise jub vanraj ne jub yeh kaha ki toshu ki shaadi se kinjal se nahin hogi tub toshu ji drunk haalat mein sach bola

Aur isi tarah jub vanraj ne oppose toshu ka rakhi ke pent house mein jaane ko tabhi. Toshu ka sach yaad aaya

Sahi kiya na, mann ki baat bata Diya na, woh kya feel karta hai clearly bata Diya.. ismein galat kya hai?

Yeh toshu ji sach tabhi bolte hai jub baat toshu ke favour mein nahin hoti hai

Otherwise i have never seen toshu speaking truth. Sach bolne ka shauk hai to. Aisi hi sach bolo na why only speake Truth at that time only when. Condition is not favour in toshu aur yeh toshu apne baare mein bhi sach bole.

Apne defense mein baat toh karega na? What’s wrong in that? Yuhi kyun jagade mein kyun padna hai? Bapu ji kya kar raha hai? Zinda hai na ghar ke bada.. it’s his responsibility to correct Vanraj or Baa not Toshus..

Jub toshu khud leela vanraj jaisa hai to usme mooh se sach sunkar hasi aati hai

He is not like Vanraj or Leela.. He is far far far better than them.

Yahan pe toshu ke double standard ki baat ho rahi hai. Jub toshu ke against baat ho to toshu ka baat, vanraj sub bure lagne lagte hai but warna waise . Toshu har waqt baa aur vanraj ke haan mein haan milate hai

Jub vanraj aur leela anupama ko anuj ke saath kam karne ko mana kar rahe they to toshu bhi vanraj aur leela ke haan mein haan mila raha

Ab kyon nahi kar raha hai toshu oppose

Btw anupama toshu ke liye itna kar rahi use paala posa bada kiya to kya ek bete ka itna duty nahin ki woh anupama ke saath galat ho raha hai to woh khuch अगेंस्ट mein bole yeh to automatic hota hai

Btw i i Dont hope from. Toshu to support anupama but toshu is certainly double standard character jub baat apne favour mein ho to truth ka panna lekar baith jaao warna waise vanraj aur leela ke haan mein haan milaao

So certainly baa vanraj and are on same level

Jiklnko sach mein truth bolne hota woh toshu ki tarah truth ki. Definton change nahi karte

Rakhi ne help nahi ki. Usne deal ki thi aur anupama uska paisa रिटर्न bhi kar rahi thi