Originally posted by: Rohil.ban12
Rakho was being practical from the start. She analyses the situation of Shah household from the starting when vanraj and toshu introduced Kavya instead of Anupama. And then she doesn’t want her daughter to be Anupama 2.0 who is just involved in household work and is treated like nothing by most of the family members. Being from a rich family, she doesn’t want her daughter to have anything less she was having at her own house. In starting episode, she mentioned how kinjal spends lakhs on shopping and everything. And in real life a person who has habit of doing such things will not get adjusted in such a conservative, reserved or hypocrite family. Moreover, their standard of living was much lower than daves, and no parent would want their girl to adjust so much if they have been providing their children with so much luxuries.
From the start Rakhi has been the practical character. If she would not have revealed vanrajs affair then everything would have been same. See always keeps the correct point. Though sometimes blames Anupama for unnecessary thing where not required but she is a practical character who just wants best for her daughter and is not negative in any way from that point.
Also in the initial stage, her contempt for Anupamaa for not being educated is justified in a way. She would want her daughter to go to a house where the MIL is educated enough. However we know the reason behind it, she doesn't. While she guesses Anupamaa didn't care enough to study, it was actually her pregnancy in the first year of marriage and then Vanraj's grandmother's reluctance that didn't let her study.
1