Originally posted by: jagdu
Abhirami clearly wanted Indu for keeps and everybody in the show racks their brains and finally wrest her back after she's cured. That's every one, including the law.
Let me ask you something. Did Abhirami lie? She merely told Indu what TIT himself believed. Was she right? No. Was it a lie? No. Was it an act of decency? Heck, no. But would the truth have eventually come out? Yes.
But all's well that ends well. Indu's sangaptham ended reasonably.
Originally posted by: jagdu
Why did Mrs. RK get high bp? Because Abirami was bent upon giving the house to Srini. RK even falls at Srini's feet to save his wife from death. Shanti pleads with Abirami. Unforseen for such a decent woman, Shanti. Mrs. RK dies, and even then Abirami is ruthless about the house. It's certainly the concern about the house that has killed Mrs. RK.
Which I do not understand AT ALL. Once RK had willed the house away to Abhirami, legally, it becomes HERS to do with as she pleases. That is exactly what she was doing and why was she giving Oosi Vedi the house in the first place? For information about her parents, specifically her father. So whose fault is it? Abhirami's, for giving away what is legally hers, or OV for blackmailing her and withholding information until she gave him the house?
Morally, yes, Abhirami may have made a mistake BUT she has now regretted the error of her ways and reformed. Why still flog a dead horse?
Originally posted by: jagdu
Again when Abirami is at the hotel where Sam first appears, followed by Arjun, when the murder is commited, Abirami is all bent upon getting Arjun framed for murder. She testifies against him. Again the whole family, society and law save Arjun from the wrathful Abhirami.
Am I missing something here? Abhirami was at the hotel quite by chance, not by design. And she told the court what she SAW, that she saw Arjun enter the hotel and leave in a hurry with a crowd on his tail. When the judge SPECIFICALLY asked her if she saw him commit murder, her answer was a TRUTHFUL "Yes!"
And if you must blame someone for causing trouble for Arjun, blame Arjun himself for being in the wrong place at the wrong time and our ACD for not covering up for him.
Originally posted by: jagdu
Finally Abirami's childhood. Charulata runs out of the house after she learns that her husband is a murderer. She saves her daughter's life from growing up under the shadow of a murderer.
That was her choice. How was this influenced by Abhirami in any way?
Originally posted by: jagdu
And remember SKPD's story about the monkey? Charulata wonders aloud in the temple as to why she saved CP.
Did Charu bother to tell Abhirami the story of the monkey? Why not? Why cannot she warn Abhirami about her father like she warned Jamuna? And as for why she "saved" CP - who asked her? SKPD would never killed his infant daughter if she had left her behind, he was simply after his fleeing wife. And why didn't OKS tell Abhirami about what transpired that night instead of giving her cryptic dialogs like "Yennoda karunaila anniki uyir pozhachenga!" What the heck is Abhirami supposed to make of this?
Originally posted by: jagdu
All this does not take any analysis. One cannot be blind to these facts. There is only one aspect to Abirami's character, and that's revenge. Vengence towards others. She does not deserve any kindness.
I couldn't disagree more. Sorry.