my reply

Page

rajh

@rajh

Sparkler

Posted: 12 years ago

abhishek quoted me in article page--but there i cant reply as there is restriction about number of posts...why he quoted my name and posted question to me i dont know...

dose it mean i need to take his permission before posting on article page??

i have every right to question content of the article...my comment is for article---i am not interested in commenting about others post..

looks like this is attention seeking tactic...

this is his question for my post in article page---

--------------------------------------

@100raj

Dear Raj,

My comment was meant for those whose interest and appreciation for a show does not start and end with a single actor/actress. There are many more aspects to a show that need discussion and debate. Television serials are a team effort not a one man show.

What you are propagating is called mindless idol-worship. It lacks reason and rationality.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

and this is my reply---

@abhishek--

the story dose not end with actor or actress exit...it is cvs call what character they want to keep and what character to end...

cvs could have ended anamika character if simran did not want to continue playing negative role--

is she so much inevitable for this show??

PH could have brought another actress to play anamika ---

but accorded to there script cvs ended rano role as ending anamika would mean ending this serial..

if i like simran --then it is my option--nobody has right to question my liking...

you quoted me so i replied--otherwise article page is not for arguments...

------

p.s-- i did not clicked dislike button to his post as it reduces forum ranking--i don't like to harm this forum ranking...

Edited by 100raj - 12 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

Abhishek_5

@Abhishek_5

Explorer

Posted: 12 years ago

Dear Raj,

Firstly, there are no tactics behind me quoting your name in the Telly Buzz section. If anyone would go through your comment (which was posted only a few minutes after I raised some questions in my comment), it would be clear that your post consisted of direct replies to the questions and issues I had raised in my comment. It was a reply directed towards my comment without naming me. Therefore, the only reason I took your name was because I didnt want to make my reply a proxy in the entire argument. I wanted to make the readers aware that there is a difference in opinion between us on this article.

Secondly, you dont need mine nor anybody else's permission to post anything on any page. But you should not expect somebody else not to respond when you are making an indirect attack on his point of view. If you want to enter into an argument with someone make it decent and direct. No need to hide your discontent and disagreement. You should not expect others to respond indirectly if you are doing so.

Thirdly, you surely have every right to question or even outrightly reject every TB article. The only thing required is to make your criticism open and direct, not veiled and proxy.

Fourthly, if you like a particular actor/ actress, nobody has any right to question your liking. But, you need to understand that there is a difference between questioning and criticising. Nobody can question someone else's choice, but can certainly criticise it- without personally attacking either the choice-maker or the choice itself. Please ask yourself have I ever made a personal attack on someone on this forum?

As far as the CVs and the story is concerned we can leave that discussion for some other time. I think we already have had plenty of arguments on that issue.

Thanks for giving me an opportunity to make my stand clear and public in this forum.