Sm facts ovr y Ana was nt wrong lvng da king(EDTD)

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Arpi17

@Arpi17

Navigator

Posted: 12 years ago

#31

Originally posted by: krystal_watz
@Arpi: Okay, what about Anamika's killing SIXTEEN innocents? How would anybody justify THAT?

She killed them not only bcz they didnt luv her,but also bcz she was blood-thirsty... Their blood was her food... Humans also kills pigs,chickens etc etc for eating...She hav to eat it in order to stay alive(sort of)...U cant expect every1 to b Edward Cullen or Abhay Raichand... She is lyk Damon Salvatore...its her natural food habit... why would she change it??

Quote

441597

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#32

She didn't kill them for food, she killed them since they couldn't be brainwashed to fall in "love" with her. And even with merit to your "food" logic, would you let a maneating tiger roam anywhere close to your locality? Nope, you'd organize forces to kill it. So similarly Anamika must be hunted and killed for the sake of humanity. Done? 😉 😆

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Arpi17

@Arpi17

Navigator

Posted: 12 years ago

#33

Originally posted by: krystal_watz
She didn't kill them for food, she killed them since they couldn't be brainwashed to fall in "love" with her. And even with merit to your "food" logic, would you let a maneating tiger roam anywhere close to your locality? Nope, you'd organize forces to kill it. So similarly Anamika must be hunted and killed for the sake of humanity. Done? 😉 😆

Then go and kill her naa...:p She is a chudail... go to wikipidia and see wht chudail means if u already dont know it... As a chudail its natural for her to do..:D

Quote

Arpi17

@Arpi17

Navigator

Posted: 12 years ago

#34

And anyhow,this post was made to state the reason abt Chandralekha's affair,not Abt Ana killing 16ppl. I made a post abt that too... so pls comment on that post called 'Ana's doing-right ya wrong?'

Quote

arundhati

@arukutty

Beginner

Posted: 12 years ago

#35

i don't think anamika did the right thing...
no one can tolerate if her husband fall in love with any other women...
i am a fan of simran...not a fan of anamika...😊

Edited by arukutty - 12 years ago

Quote

Arpi17

@Arpi17

Navigator

Posted: 12 years ago

#36

Originally posted by: arukutty
i don't think anamika did the right thing...
no one can tolerate if her husband fall in love with any other women...
i am a fan of simran...not a fan of anamika...😊

Let me thank you for commenting without attacking... I would just say if u go back 350 yrs ago,this thing was pretty normal and queens also expected that. Except the rajputs,other kings had many wives,dancers etc etc.

Quote

441597

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#37

Oh, I do know what Chudail means. And the main "question" has been answered eons ago. Read the first page again. You even admitted that the Queen was not wrong. 😛
P.S. Why would I kill her? That would be up to the humans in the show. 🤣

Edited by krystal_watz - 12 years ago

Quote

Sanskari Troublemaker

@romaila

Elite

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#38

Originally posted by: krystal_watz
@Romaila: Guess you didn't go through the first few pages. I did mention that if Anamika's affair was legal/moral at the time, so was the Queen's way of getting rid of her rival. Ek kare to ras leela, dusra kare to character dheela? 🤣

yup i didn't go through previous comments as i dont like reading long paras...thats my problem dont take it personally 😳😆

naah!!! as at that time a Raja used to have many affirs at times with their daasi's so it cant be counted as Maritail affair...zamana theek nahi tha re Raja were like the God for their masses and they were free in their acts...😆.

In old era even human life was least expensive...for them the only way of getting rid of their enemy was kill them...and get free of tension 🥱. Chalo Raani ney mara to maara what was the need of cursing her...o lady u are taking her life was there any need for Shraap n all? kya zamna tha jaan b lo aur saari umar bhatkne ka shraap b do 😆

Quote

441597

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#39

Originally posted by: romaila

yup i didn't go through previous comments as i dont like reading long paras...thats my problem dont take it personally 😳😆



naah!!! as at that time a Raja used to have many affirs at times with their daasi's so it cant be counted as Maritail affair...zamana theek nahi tha re Raja were like the God for their masses and they were free in their acts...😆. 

In old era even human life was least expensive...for them the only way of getting rid of their enemy was kill them...and get free of tension 🥱. Chalo Raani ney mara to maara what was the need of cursing her...o lady u are taking her life was there any need for Shraap n all? kya zamna tha jaan b lo aur saari umar bhatkne ka shraap b do 😆

Anger management ka classes nahi thhe na. 😆

Quote

coolnfundu

@coolnfundu

Navigator

Posted: 12 years ago

#40

If it was normal to get involved with a married man, its perfectly cool for kings and queens to bump off suspects too. That was quite a done thing too.

Quote

1 2 3 4 5

Wrong

Sm facts ovr y Ana was nt wrong lvng da king(EDTD) - Page 4

Related Topics

Explore Topics