Reflections and Analysis, July 6, 2007

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

vanajaakshi

@vanajaakshi

Inactive

Posted: 18 years ago

#11

Another way to have done this is to have done smaller groups. Four, even six, not eight. Then, in each episode, they could have had two rounds, so that on Saturday, if they picked 1 or 2, that would have been after four performances.

And we could have had some of the older SRGM rounds used.

Quote

Tasha

@tashaji

Inactive

Posted: 18 years ago

#12

thanxxx 4 the updateee...buttt plzz someone postt the videooo 😭

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Mahesh Vasavada

@vasamv

Voyager

Posted: 18 years ago

#13

A good episode on the whole.Distribution is cerainly flawed.Agree there should be groups of six only and singing for two days.In the current format some better ones will be left out.
Any idea who is replacing Alkaji?

Quote

Dabulls23

@Dabulls23

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 18 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: vasamv
A good episode on the whole.Distribution is cerainly flawed.Agree there should be groups of six only and singing for two days.In the current format some better ones will be left out.
Any idea who is replacing Alkaji?

agree with you on your post.

Quote

anonmember

@anonmember

Inactive

Posted: 18 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: vasamv
A good episode on the whole.Distribution is cerainly flawed.Agree there should be groups of six only and singing for two days.In the current format some better ones will be left out.
Any idea who is replacing Alkaji?

I'd like to know too...😕
She may come back after her stage shows in North America are over.

Quote

riatagore

@riatagore

Voyager

Posted: 18 years ago

#16

As far my view judges are doing partiality to some contestents. Though they are not able to get full marks, but these judges are giving and who sungs well for them only less marks.

Quote

1 2

Reflections and Analysis, July 6, 2007 - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics