Posted:
I believe when you are making a court drama there should be enough research there to make it look realistic. Don't just try to make public stupid. For example the last episode, It was a 5 min defence for any ordinary lawyer but one of the best defence lawyer took days to solve this case. Remember he is a defence lawyer and his responsibility was to defend her client (saas) and not to catch real killer (son).
Questions KD should have asked.
- Did sharad (son) see her lighting Avni.
- Did FIL, BIL, SIL or Servent see her lighting Avni.
- Did any one see her lighting Avni.
- Is there finger print or any other evidence that prove Saas started the fire.
Answer for everything is no. Till there is any eye witness or any other evidence, police is just speculating. She could be prime suspect based on circumstances (fight between them, sharad's accusation and ghaslate order etc) but she can't be charged based on what prosecution had. It is prosecutor's responsibility to prove that she did the crime and there is no doubt about it but prosecution doesn't have any witness or evidence. Police and prodecution doesn't have any case here.
I am not a lawyer or a law student but it's a 5 min defence for me. Here we are showing one of the best defence lawyer is defending her and he is not asking any of these questions. Why the hell they show KD always finding the real criminal. It is police's responsibility. His responsibility is just to nullify any evidence prosecution is bringing forward.
Music Corner
Fan Fictions
