Posted:
After a long time i m writing something..
but i was thinking to write my views ever since d new track started...
The track basically dealt with Naitik's reaction on Naksh's attitude. Naitik made the decision of sending him to hostel , not actually as a sort of punishment but also because he wants a disciplined life for him.
My question is ...Is presuming things so necessary?? I mean...as soon as they saw d 500 rs note in Naksh's pocket...dey all asumed that he took it intentionally n he was stealing things from home.
i have been noticing this things since past 2-3 episode...that naksh tried so hard to tell every1 ...his point of view, but no 1 bothered to listen
Even when he went to G3..she scolded him n didnt listened to wat he said. Then when Akshi went to his room, she also scolded him n wenever duggu tried saying sumthing in his defense.../...dey all scolded him dat he s making excuses...
I agree that Naitik took him back home today but what if he would have went further n gotten duggu admitted in Hostel.
Another question which came to my mind was ...wat if dat gardener n his son ..have not come to home...Then these people would have always thought that Duggu stole things .
So in all ...my point is whether d presumption is good . We often in our daily lives also presume things. or Isnt it better to clarify things before making a judgement about other person??? Wouldn't the things would have been different if ny1 from family have atleast listened to Duggu once.??
I think i have bored u people ...do tell me ur views about the last lines i said???
Expecting a response
1