Live In Relationship

YHM despite having a positive approach about new world, is coming out quite regressive when it comes to this particular concept. Live In Relationships are not wrong, an immature girl like ruhi, who is living off of her parent's money, who has no degree or any kind of educational qualifications, wants to move in with a man who is 30 years old father of a little girl, he never took responsibility of, who can't afford a home, but can live with an immature girl, who's bringing money with her. Any kind of relationship between these two is wrong, what the hell it is about a 20 year old girl dying to be mother of a girl who's older than her younger sibling, even if they are married, the relationship is in no way "Nayi Soch".

Well said . The context is totally different in case of Ruhi , as you said adults being in a live in relationship isn't a big thing but for few of us it is and will always be ,that's how we Indians are and it's perfectly fine.

Originally posted by: sarsyed

Well said . The context is totally different in case of Ruhi , as you said adults being in a live in relationship isn't a big thing but for few of us it is and will always be ,that's how we Indians are and it's perfectly fine.

I just one to add one thing to this going by what happened in the past

Romi and Mihika were in a live in relationship and yes they were adults and were in love too.

Shagun and Raman were just like Ishita and Mani were though there was no love but for the society they were a couple .

Shagun has been in a live in relationship with Ashok and Manoj as well ,yes they were adults.

It's often said kids don't listen they watch and learn so Ruhi not finding this odd is not a surprise she has seen her parents do it themselves.

Very well said