Originally posted by: CharmGal
Not sure if I agree with you mancityfan and Muskan was correct that Raman had full rights to challenge her actions.
From what I have understood is that he had clearly acknowledged and amended his words by saying she is a mother and felt responsible for her death as he knew he had crossed his lines with his harsh words. However he was justified to be angry that Ishita took the coward way by allowing them to think she died and ran away from their kids thus in my opinion she had lost her rights as a mother. What kind of a mother would do that? She raised Aliya but not her own. Raman was frustrated with Ishita, yes he had said things wrongly to her but he said in anger and was scared about a life without his daugther. He spoke without actually listening his own words which I think he would rectify if she gave him a chance basically coming back home after mani saved her. She owed it to her surviving children Adi and Pikhu and Raman. But she ddidn't and according to Raman at this moment she didn't care about their family their kids that she left didn't come back. It's had been 7 years. Raman was wrong but Ishita was equally wrong.
So again Amma and Raman are justified in their words. If everyone took seriously and walked out when their hubands or wives have said harsh words in anger and without meaning too but they did it due to their frustrations of the cirsumstances. And not giving their parnter another chance to clarify their words - there would be high divorce rates in the soceity.