Raman is wrong today

Sorry. This is the first post I opposing Raman.

Is he the same Raman who made arrest his own BIL for sexual harassment. Is he the same Raman who wanted to arrest romi for Amma accident. Is he the same Raman who made his beloved to face JDC.

What happened to him today?
Why he behaved like this?

I didn't talk about sarika conversation because in that conversation what he said was true but why did he seek pathak help.
He could've to left this case romi and sarika but why did he support romi at absence. If he wants to get better solution, he can arrange a conversation between bhalla family and sarika. If he can't , he should've to be quiet but supporting romi is wrong thing to me.

If he support romi tthen what mistake param did . he also did same but why this partiality.

he is not supporting romi he did that bcoz he dnt want his mom to roam and search a lawyer..even if neil is there but i m sure he wont allow them to do anything wrong to sarika in court remember the scene during amma accident...have faith he wont let anything wrong happen to sarika...

sorry. I know but there is no difference between supporting evil and supporting who supports evil. I said he could have arrange meeting with sarika and bhallas. but he didn't.adi case is different and romi case is different. it isn't new to romi. he already did many mistakes. lemme remind you accident track. why he wanted to arrest romi for amma accident though his mother opposed but what happened today.simply it doesn't make sense.

i dont think raman supporting romi...i have full faith in Raman...he wont do anything wrong...he has somthing in his mind...may be with d help of pathak he will try to convince romi n mrs bhalla for roka marriage...

you have a point suseen. sochna padega detail me. will give you reply if I get something for counter argument

@pooja
I didn't think so. If he really obsessed with marriage, he didn't have to speak sarika like this. And what is point here to convince.

Romi did mmistake and he didnt want to take that responsibilities. He should face consequences . here what is the point about convince. As raman said, if romi loves sarika, there will be meaning for convincing. Mom and son both wants to get rid of her. Here why should we consider about convincing

Originally posted by: Colt.Pixy

you have a point suseen. sochna padega detail me. will give you reply if I get something for counter argument

u r speechless... 😆 me too
good post...i would say wait n watch...i think somthing is fishy.. 😆

I have been a silent reader of this forum, and enjoy all the lively discussions. This track I find it interesting as Romi never redeemed himself for all the misdemeanors/crimes he committed because it was against family bala/mihika and they choose to overlook. But this latest case I don't understand how it can be sexual harassment as the advances were not unwelcome for sarika. What Param did with Ishita and Sarika was definitly sexual harassment because his sexual advances were unwelcome to both the ladies. Here I feel she was duped by Romi and she is equally responsible for her situation, but probably can sue romi for breach of promises made and paternity...

I've not seen d epi yet.

but replying on points mentioned by u in post.

He got Param arrested because he clear cut ATTEMPTED RAPE on Ishita, Blackmailed Sarika, got her fired from her job.

When Romi was blamed for Amma accident, that was a serious crime like ATTEMPTED MURDER.

but here, Romi didn't rape Sarika. Yes, he slept with her, with her consent. He has not done wat Param had tried on Ishita. Both just SLEPT, on MUTUAL Agreement.

Now when sarika's pregnant, he's refusing to take d responsibility, thats WRONG. And Raman isn't favouring him on this.

but he has to help his brother cause, firstly, its Ashok's plan to defame him, though he's not aware of it for now.

secondly, d case of physical harassment on Romi is wrong. Sarika should've complained about it on d very next hour of molestation in case of a harassment, and not after months, when shes pregnant.

buddy I have only one thing to say.