What happened to Jagan and Harjeet's enmity?

QueenKordeilia thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#1
Amba and Charan were always complaining that if Jagan became Shah, there'd be loads of bloodshed for both the Pawania and Bajwa clans due to Jagan and Harjeet always being at loggerheads. Jagan has been Shah for a while now but nothing is even happening! In fact, if it weren't for Simran, Jagan wouldn't even bother visiting Harjeet.

So Charan and Lala Ji didn't die in vain? What a relief.
Edited by QueenKordeilia - 8 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

17

Views

4.5k

Users

4

Likes

8

Frequent Posters

QueenKordeilia thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#2
Actually, there might be bloodshed after Rohan and Simran get married.
The.Wanderer thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#3
I sure hope not. But funnily, there was a lot more bloodshed when Mannu was the Shah. So Jagan is doing something right after all. 😆
QueenKordeilia thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#4
Bloodshed when Manu was Shah? When? You mean eighteen-year-old Manu, right?
The.Wanderer thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#5
Nope. The post leap episode starts with a voice over by Mannu. Stating that the enemity has become even more bloody.
QueenKordeilia thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#6
Oh. I forgot. She actually said it got more bloody? I think it's just one of those things that the writers put into the script but disregarded as soon as the ML entered.
QueenKordeilia thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#7
I was actually looking forward to the Pawanias and Panchayat realising what a bad Shah Jagan is due to his bloodlust (Harjeet as well for that matter) and wanting Preet back despite the fact that she is a female.
Want old Waaris back
The.Wanderer thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#8
Yes she says something to the effect of khoonkhar. I think that means bloody. Yes, miss the old Waaris. Want it back.
QueenKordeilia thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#9
Khoonkhar? Never heard of it.
I think Waaris will go back to its original concept but it'll take a while.
The.Wanderer thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#10
I think I got khoonkhar wrong. I searched for its meaning. The nearest it goes to is fierce or dreadful. But yeah the gist of the conversation is, Jagan is doing something right. The enemity has become lame since he became a Shah!!!

Hope what you say is correct.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".