Originally posted by: shrutichopra
Hey!
I just chanced upon the Debate Mansion and it seems like a very my kind of place.
welcome aboardπ
One question that gets me thinking every single time is that we(the people of the world) say a particular thing/path is 'right' while the other is 'wrong'. But who determines this?
oh, lot of sources that make those distinctions. our sense of righteousness comes from our values and morals. our parents r primarily responsible for instilling the righteousness in us during our childhood. generally speaking, religion also guides people about what's right and what's wrong.
the quirk comes from the fact that different people interpret the same religion/religious teaching differently. therefore, i would say, right or wrong is determined based on our interpretation of our religion's teachings, our upbringing, and the society in which we live.
Who distinguishes them and why do we take things as acceptable and unacceptable?
on the basic level, once we r all grown up (that is if we ever grow up), our conscience helps us distinguishing between what's right and what's wrong. now, how much attention we pay to our conscience will be a separate debate.
What makes the human psyche think in such a manner and how 'right' or 'wrong' things really are?
when u bring humans into an equation, u totally mess it up. generally speaking, people judge right and wrong based on how they happen to be living their lives. we all have this tendency to justify what we r doing as "right" even if it happens to be wrong. in this sense, we humans tend to create our own reality.
Many might say it is the society that decides but then again who is this 'society' and how do they decide? And if that is answered why do they decide? why is such a power vested in the 'society' and not merely in an 'individual'?
well, at the end of the day, society is made up of individuals too. individuals let society dictate right or wrong for them because most want to be accepted. "power in numbers" as qwerty said. now, one society may consider something right, as in sati pratha in older times, that would be totally unacceptable in a different society during similar era or the same society in a different era. therefore, i wouldn't blindly go by society's definition of right and wrong but i amy choose not to voice my opinion because i may not want to be shunned or ridiculed.
now, we can decide to follow our own path and some do follow their own path but the problem arises when they think their path is the right one and start judging the paths others are following. if we all mind our own business and live and let live, half the problems in this world will be solved. but this doesn't happen...does it?
Would love to see the debate and opinions on this!
Shruti
comment:
p_commentcount