The Big Q: Will Ram Gopal Verma do justice to Sippy's Sholay?
26 May - Tanushree Chatterjee 11:19 pm
Ever since Ram Gopal Verma announced the remake of Sippy's magnum opus 'Sholay', he has been criticised everywhere. From the streets to the courtroom, Verma had to deal with charges of infringement of copyright of the popular title 'Sholay' and the character name 'Gabbar'. We will now try and bring to you the plus and minus points of making a classic for the new generation and for showing one's own creativity in Ramu's own unique style.
The Why's and Why Not's of making the classic 'Sholay':
Why 'Sholay' should not be remade by RG Verma:
• Is Ram Gopal Verma the right person to remake 'Sholay'? - When we have great film-makers in the form of commercial greats like Yash Raj Chopra, Karan Johar, Vidhu Vinod Chopra et al, then why Ram Gopal Verma has decided to go on with this big project? And remember Verma has only had semi-hits or flops in the form of horror and action films.
• Why to remake a classic? - It has been said repeatedly that classics of Indian cinema should be let alone and not be remade just to tamper with them. A classic should be cherished and passed on from generation to generation and not be degraded by someone else's interpretation. They are a source of great inspiration and learning of Indian cinema.
• Inappropriate of Verma to use the film title and character name (Gabbar)? - The copyrights of the film rests with the Sippy's firm and the use of the title and the character name is illegal as per the copyright act.
• RGV's main focus is on Gabbar Singh - Unlike the original classic, Ram Gopal Verma has glorified the character of Gabbar and has given him the focal importance in the film. The classic had all the characters with equally specific and vital role to play in the narration. But, R G Verma wants to cash in on the popularity of Big B as Gabbar.
• Verma's degrading of female characters is an insult to the original script? - In 'Ram Gopal Verma Ki Sholay', the female characters have been reduced to side kicks unlike the original film where each female character had an important role to play.
• Sholay Part II a better idea than the remake of 'Sholay'? - If one remembers the end of the blockbuster classic, Gabbar Singh never got killed by Veeru or Thankur, but was arrested by the cops. So, a second part to the classic could have build up more curiosity among the viewers and no question of tampering with the great work would have been discussed.
Why Not- No harm in making the remake of a classic:
• A film-maker's effort never goes a waste: If Ram Gopal Verma has decided to take such a bold step and remake a classic then we are nobody to comment on his potential. Whether he is among the ranks of great film-makers or not or he delivers mindless family dramas or love stories or not, he is definitely a film-maker of high repute in the inustry.
• Another Sholay cannot disturb the real classic: A lot has been said that a classic should not be remade but a classic cannot be disturbed by another film based on it. Sholay has its placed fixed in the history of Indian cinema and another Sholay can only add on to its list of honours.
• The title and the character names have been changed: After legal action, Verma has already changed the name of the film. Moreover, the actual owners of the Sippy firm have already passed away and there is no such rule that their grandson S. Sippy has the copyright to the film's title or character name as the firm got dissolved in the late 90's.
• Why to judge Verma before the film's release? - Not just Sholay, but the combination of Big B and R G Verma has hyped the film and so has the controversies surrounding it. But why to fail a film-maker of his calibre eeven before the release of his film. A piece of creativity has to be seen and understood and then criticised if and where required. Its Verma's decision to highlight Gabbar or whosoever he wants. He is not attempting to revisit Sippy's Sholay but only to pay his tribute to the great work in his own way.
• A film-maker should experiment - Actors and MPs like Hema Malini and Dharmendra are raising fingers at Verma that he has changed the script, degraded the female characters and weakened the storyline of the original. But if he had kept everything like the original then where is the creativity and originality. The challenge is to live up to the stalwart's name and to present your own work in your own style. With a trademark experimental director we can only expect surprises with this mega release.
• Remake is only a tribute and not a piece for comparison - A Sholay Part II is definitely a good idea and S. Sippy should go ahead with it rather than fighting court cases for infringement of copyright with Verma. But a remake should not be seen as an attempt to degrade a classic but a way to pay tribute to the timeless genius produced by our industry. A remake should always be seen as a reflection of the past great and not a mirror image of it. Comaprisons can only lead to dissapointment and a good film will not be appreciated for its originality but its failure in matching up to the classic.
Lastly, I would say that leave comparisons aside and sit up to watch this film in the nearby theatres and treat it like a new film with a fresh storyline. The name and characters may well remind you of the original, but this a different film with different characters and to watch the superstar in this mega villainous role can only be a treat that you cant afford to miss. If you have to compare then compare with Ramu's previous works because success or no success this film-maker sure has oddles of talent and a genius in him.
Tanushree Chatterjee
comment:
p_commentcount