Originally posted by: SolidSnake
1.Do you support the incident, condemn it or dont care about it?
Condemn it, it was wrong and should not have happened. They could have built a grand temple in front of the mosque, or atleast should have waited for Court's ruling.
πππ@Court ruling...Please excuse me, but I had to laugh...I am glad that you trust in our judiciary system
2.What were your feelings about the incident at that point of time?
I had no idea about it then, I was in 8th std then.
Hmm,, but were you in India only that time???Because with the kind of hungama and the riots that happened after that, I thought no one could have missed it...I was 12 year old, but felt so stressed outπ with what was happening around
3.What do you feel today about it?
Yahi ki it shouldn't have happened, it lead to riots which resulted in scores of innocent people getting murdered. But it wasn't without +ves, it was a turning point in Modern India's history, finally there was a nationalist party who could take on and stand up to Congress. Congress era was finally over (Thank God!). And it also brought to notice the blatant minority appeasement politics.
4.Some argued that it brought back all the Hindus together..Do you agree??
True to a certain extent, it brought Hindu sense of idendity on the forefront.
5.Is it important to claim back all the Hindu temples that are now under the Islamic structures?
No, bec'se it would be impossible to do that and most imp waste of time and energy which should rather be spent on more pressing things. Jo ho gaya so ho gayaa, gade murde ukhadne se koi faayda nahin. Lekin, we must stop the kind of minority appeasement preparated by our "secular" brigade...
6.Did BJP get benifitted because of this or did it work against?
Yes, they benefitted immensly, from 2 seats in 1984 to the biggest party (183 seats) in 1999 elections...everyone wanted to stop BJP by hook or crook.
7.Congress obviously condemned the act, but later when Shri.P.V.Narasimha Rao became the PM, he also did not take any action against the possible offenders, why???Do you think he was secretly supporting the incident, or he also did not want to lose the Hindu Vote Bank?
PVNR did not take any "action" against the "offenders" as...
1) doing so would have created serious law and order problems.
2) he had no moral authority to do anything since Congress Party itself unlocked the doors of the mosque. And not to mention the allegations that Central Govt didn't do anything to stop demolition, it sat like mute spectator.
3) he did not want to lose Hindu votes.
4) he was too laid back, he is believed to have said "no action is also an action" or something like that...π
comment:
p_commentcount