Posted: 1 months ago
#1

[Post Removed]

Created

Last reply

Replies

51

Views

2635

Users

28

Likes

92

Frequent Posters

infinity101 thumbnail
Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail Anniversary 7 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 1 months ago
#2

Disagree. I think she was a good actress. Sridevi was good too but her only drawback was that squeaky voice.

TotalBetty thumbnail
Anniversary 10 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 1 months ago
#3

She is AI generated?

TotalBetty thumbnail
Anniversary 10 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 1 months ago
#4

This movie was way ahead of it’s time


https://youtu.be/HuAjeuKXX7c?si=KMeEg3mOndkifjK0

Maroonporsche thumbnail
Posted: 1 months ago
#5

Everyone has a different appeal. Despite not having the same skill set as Oscar winners The Rock is much more famous person than a lot of them 

Edited by Maroonporsche - 1 months ago
RaniPreityAish thumbnail
Visit Streak 90 0 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 1 months ago
#6

I always thought it was odd that all her comebacks have failed. And now she's relegated to streaming. And Madhuri has tried multiple, multiple comebacks so it isn't even just once or twice that she flopped but numerous times now.


Sridevi's track record is stellar compared to hers. I've heard lots of people on this forum say that between the two, Sridevi was the real actress and Madhuri could never get past the 90s. The fact that her main work is showing up on dance shows also seems to indicate that perhaps she lacks the substance of other actresses like Rani, Aishwarya, Juhi, Kajol, Urmila, etc.

Kamala05 thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 1 months ago
#7

She is a very talented actress compared to any of the actresses in the current era . She was a package of dancing prowess,acting skills and real feminine beauty . That said , Sridevi was in a different league,the only actress in Indian cinema who had and still has strong fanbase across India due to her exceptional acting skills. No matter , how much the PR's of current era actress boast ,they won't have the same appeal onscreen because Sridevi was one such artist born to captivate the audience.

Posted: 1 months ago
#8

Originally posted by: Kasa3

Hot take: she only had dancing skills to prop her up as an actress. Men paid to watch her for her naach. The second she became older and couldn't rely on her looks and dancing, all her comebacks failed. Contrast to Sridevi, a real actress, who was successful in all her comebacks.

What the hell is going on here? If Madhuri wasn't a real actress, then post 2010 female debutants don't even qualify to be called as eye candies coz they suck in everything they do

sharaban thumbnail
Visit Streak 90 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 0 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 1 months ago
#9

Originally posted by: RaniPreityAish

I always thought it was odd that all her comebacks have failed. And now she's relegated to streaming. And Madhuri has tried multiple, multiple comebacks so it isn't even just once or twice that she flopped but numerous times now.


Sridevi's track record is stellar compared to hers. I've heard lots of people on this forum say that between the two, Sridevi was the real actress and Madhuri could never get past the 90s. The fact that her main work is showing up on dance shows also seems to indicate that perhaps she lacks the substance of other actresses like Rani, Aishwarya, Juhi, Kajol, Urmila, etc.



She was a better actress/performer than all of the names mentioned above.


Last female superstar for a reason, not just due to dance.

fazgostoso thumbnail
Visit Streak 30 0 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail Engager 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 1 months ago
#10

Originally posted by: SapnaSuch

She was done and dusted since 2007. Now she is irrelevant with streaming shows and movies which are all ratings flops.

At least she is doing better than Aishwarya Rai who has no shows, no movies! lol smiley39