The success of "Animal" at the box office suggests a preference for explicit content over family-friendly movies. Unlike "Tiger 3," which lacks such scenes, introducing a historic Salman and Katrina sex scene could potentially elevate box office earnings to over 500 crore. Including Emran Hashmi's long-awaited kissing scene might even push the collection beyond 1000 crore. It appears that audiences are interested to cinemas for such explicit content.
Yes had their been such a scene it surely would have plus had Katrina dropped her towel or it appeared that her and Michelle had some lip lock I’m sure. Yet Salmans movie so romance on a classy way not cheap.
The success of "Animal" at the box office suggests a preference for explicit content over family-friendly movies. Unlike "Tiger 3," which lacks such scenes, introducing a historic Salman and Katrina sex scene could potentially elevate box office earnings to over 500 crore. Including Emran Hashmi's long-awaited kissing scene might even push the collection beyond 1000 crore. It appears that audiences are interested to cinemas for such explicit content.
Salman is a virgin. His movies can't portray what he doesn't know himself.
There is a difference between Sandeep Reddy Vanga and Maneesh Sharma, it is always not about the explicit content but how much batshit extreme one can go with the vision, SRV has a vision, be it misogynistic, he does not treat his male leads on the basis of their names, for example Ranbir was not Ranbir but Ranvijay, similarly Vijay was Arjun Reddy, so much that people thought he is a toxic man in real.. LOL
Salman the name alone is not enough, a movie has to have that mojo too as people ain't fools
It's not about Salman it is about what audience want and how to earn a box office collection
that’s a cheap dig. In that sense the Kapoor lad n Ranveer singh they vile mygonstic humans.Originally posted by: RaniPreityAish
Salman is a virgin. His movies can't portray what he doesn't know himself.
I can assure u were that in this movie this movie would have your all over the world seeing the movie repeatedly . Hes a trendsetter. He set the trend in tere naam. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ia1vUWaoqzE&pp=ygUKbGFnYW4gbGFnaQ%3D%3DOriginally posted by: MiVida_Messi
There is a difference between Sandeep Reddy Vanga and Maneesh Sharma, it is always not about the explicit content but how much batshit extreme one can go with the vision, SRV has a vision, be it misogynistic, he does not treat his male leads on the basis of their names, for example Ranbir was not Ranbir but Ranvijay, similarly Vijay was Arjun Reddy, so much that people thought he is a toxic man in real.. LOL
Salman the name alone is not enough, a movie has to have that mojo too as people ain't fools
Originally posted by: Maroonporsche
This is apples and pomegranates
Just want to know Tiger 3 could have earned more or not by adding those scenes.
comment:
p_commentcount