Disaster, miscast and special effects are still trash.
Disaster, miscast and special effects are still trash.
Finally someone said all of what I wanted to say.
Prabhas looks like a villain himself than Lord Ram.
No calm demeanour that Ram was known to posess.
Rama is a controlled warrior. Not an epitome of mere aggression.
Guy playing Lakshman looks like Abhishek. Kriti looks like a western model playing dress up to look like Mata Sita.
This is a certified disaster and dead on arrival and will make even Sagar's both versions of Ramayan look like even bigger classics despite poor special effects.
I am convinced not everyone can handle epics and historicals.
Kriti doesn't have an ounch of grace that requires to play Sita, neither does she look the part. While Prabhas is a good actor but he's looking more like Ravaan (to be honest not even Ravaan, he's looking a whole different character) than Ram.
These days I'm watch Star plus's Siya k Ram & the actors are so good. Even the ones who played the younger versions aptly played their parts.
Sigh .. this is gonna flop badly
I want to know where is sindoor of Mata Sita and janeu of all the males?
Lakshman, Rama, Hanuman are always shown wearing janeu in all shows and calendar art, older films.
Why not in posters or promos of this film and why not a single shot or poster has Kriti wear sindoor?
Originally posted by: atominis
I want to know where is sindoor of Mata Sita and janeu of all the males?
Lakshman, Rama, Hanuman are always shown wearing janeu in all shows and calendar art, older films.
Why not in posters or promos of this film and why not a single shot or poster has Kriti wear sindoor?
If there is enough noise about it, Deepika ki choli ki tarah yeh bhi digitally edit hoga😅
I agree, Siya ke Ram also looks better than this crap.
NTR Jr as Ram when he was 12/13 years old The entire cast in this Ramayan were children. He definitely makes a much better Ram than Prabhas.
The poster is so highly edited. Can't even recognize anyone.
comment:
p_commentcount