Originally posted by: atominis
Stop it man.
Sushmita did have drinking issues. Now you make whatever you want out of it. Dependence or not or how her botoxed face looks or not.
Go and fight with magazines that wrote it. And troll videos where Sush looks visibly drunk or finding it hard to stand still.
Why argue with me? I am not interested in stretching it further at all nor I want to be educated on alcoholism.
Sridevi also had no weight issues and her face was too botoxed to give away anything. Yet her drinking issues came up after her death.
I am arguing with you because pretty sure the magazines would stick to one story unlike you. A day ago, you never claimed she was dependent. And now you don't care whether she was dependent or not. And not imply others are stating things they are not. You really do not wish to continue that is why you came back once again, implying things I am not.
It is very clear you are not interested in being educated on alcoholism, but you need to, or else you will continue to label anyone who drinks as an alcoholic. It is very clear you don't understand anything about alcoholism. Plenty of people drink. Very few are alcoholics. I am pretty sure magazines understand that. I am now 100% sure they probably did not even state anything close to what you were implying. Being seen drunk once does not make anyone an alcoholic.
Drinking issues mean dependence? You clearly coming here and saying drinking issues dependence or not is very telling. Then run away pretending like I denied she drinks, or even can be an alcoholic, and pretended like I am a fanatic when I proved otherwise and run away. Sad state of affairs when your go-to is reiterating already disproven statements.
Edited by Grumpydwarf24 - 1 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount