I agree but do all actors not deserve fair opportunities?
I have never seen any actor from Northeast doing normal roles in Bollywood. Danny is from Sikkim and he mostly played villain with exception of few films where he was a friendly sidekick. He was told to his face that he looks like a watchman (alluding to Gorkhas who often worked as security guards).
It is strange how Bollywood could not find a single talented actor from NE even to make Mary Kom biopic.
I think any sardar actor like Diljit etc could have been cast in Kesari, atleast as a supporting actor if not main lead.
I mean there are many ways to turn away an actor rather than asking him to change name or give up identity. Jagjit had come to be a singer. Not actor. Still he was asked to give up turban for better prospects finding work in Bombay. Gulzar also changed his name and shaved beard, gave up his turban. Till Maachis, not many in masses knew he was a Sikh. Why a script writer or lyricist or filmmaker needs to change his name or look?
Dozens of yesteryear actors changed their names and obfuscated their identity. Dilip Kumar, Meena Kumari, Mala Sinha, Madhubala, Nargis, Ajit, Geeta Bali - why? Are you taken for your talent or your identity/name?
I know BW is not doing social work but why be openly biased either?
Why is Bollywood called Indian cinema or representative of India when not all Indians are part of it anyway?
Southern actresses got flak even if they got success. Hema, Sridevi were mocked for language all the time and Rauf Ahmad, Gautam Rajadhyaksha once wrote Sridevi would have been the 'best ever if not for language barrier'. Sridevi was mocked for her voice, accent, language till the end of her career as a main lead.
Still all so called greatest actress titles go to ones from Hindi belt or who knew chaste Hindi. Rekha is probably the only South Indian actress who got Best actress in last 50 years award, perhaps because her Hindi is not weak and she has no typical accent.
79