Originally posted by: Pirated_Fun
Just saying Simran has done the highest business among all his films. Kangana should have gone for a better director in terms of BO Pull after TWMR. He should speak out about the ill treatment. But he has only given flops and disasters. His films don't even do 10 crore business .
HANSAL MEHTA FILMOGRAPHY
It boggles my mind that anyone would think like this. His other films were very low budget, even if they were disasters much less money was lost. So let’s compare Simran and Shahid - both collected about half their budgets so yes Simran collected much more but it also LOST much more than Shahid as well. Everyone lost money (except Kangana of course). No business person would claim Simran was Mehta’s biggest success.
Suppose someone buys a property for 6 cr then sells it for 3 cr taking a 3 cr loss. Later the same guy buys a property for 30 cr then sells it for 15 cr taking a 15 cr loss. Imagine that guy claiming the second deal was his biggest success because he sold that property for 5X what he sold the first property for. That’s ridiculous! After the first deal (Shahid) the investor walked away 3 cr in the hole. After the second deal (Simran) the investor walked away 15 cr in the hole. If someone had a gun to their head and had to choose to be the money guy for Shahid or Simran, what sane person would choose the 15 cr loss over the 3 cr loss?
comment:
p_commentcount