Were all the Warriors in Kurukshetra related?

wayward thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 3 years ago

Most of the main warriors were part of the family in one way of the other.


Were the other warriors, the allies, also related to each other?


I mean, most of the Indian royal houses were interlinked anyway at that time! ЁЯШЖ


I like to believe that every warrior up in that field was fighting at least one family member, does that have some gravity? ЁЯдФ

Created

Last reply

Replies

3

Views

256

Users

3

Likes

5

Frequent Posters

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 3 years ago

I don't think Pandayas were related to anyone.


There is a mention of someone from the kingdom of far west who were two sets of cousins. One set of cousins 5 brothers joined Kauravas and the other set of 100 brothers joined Pandavas. 

surabhi01 thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 3 years ago

It is said that Mahabharata рдореЗрдВ рдЕрдкрдиреЗ рдХреЗ beech рд▓рдбрд╝рд╛рдЗ  рд╣реБрдИ  so I think  рд▓рдбрд╝рд╛рдЗ рдореЗрдВ рд╕рднреА relatives рдереЗ 

wayward thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

I don't think Pandayas were related to anyone.


There is a mention of someone from the kingdom of far west who were two sets of cousins. One set of cousins 5 brothers joined Kauravas and the other set of 100 brothers joined Pandavas. 


Twins, triplets, 5 vs 100s - was this some kind of a trend back then or what? ЁЯдг