would love to visit the critics at their Tax times and tell them how they should have spent their charitable contributions๐.
I wonder if Uncle Sam - the taxman will allow this as a deduction..๐ ๐
It's her money - she can do what she wants with it. I think kids in Africa need all the help they can possibly get. I dont understand why even when you do good deeds, people have a problem. People here love to complain, complain, complain. ๐
Most people here who are in a position to make a difference in other people's lives would never travel to such locales, would not have much of an awareness of the needs in other parts of the world. Oprah's gesture will definitely bring out an awareness. I am so glad she does what she does.
Although - the money spent on building the spa could have been better utilized on something else.
Originally posted by: lighthouse
I wonder if Uncle Sam - the taxman will allow this as a deduction..๐ ๐
she donated the money, someone is going to benefit from it
yup that is how a charitable contribution is defined in this part of the world๐
Originally posted by: lighthouse
Another celebrity achieving philanthropy with extravaganza...!!!! Brilliantly satisfying inner altruist in true celebrity style..!!!!!
Although I agree about her comment on inner city school kids wanting sneakers and kids in Africa wanting education.
Originally posted by: lighthouse
They say a celebrity will not do anything for free... How true... She may have spent 40 mil but as far as I am concerned she has helped only 152 girls which is no big deal for someone worth 100's of millions. She ain't getting credit for 40 mil from me....
Bill gates and Buffet have charitable foundations worth billion$ that help over a billion ppl all over the world and they don't create news like this.
So What if she created news or so what if she cud help a million other people. She chose to help 152 girls the way she chose to with her money. If other people had donated money and she had used their money to spend on spas then whatever they can criticize her. But this is all her money. she chooses to help 152 girls, good for her.
I didnt realize that helping 152 girls is not a big deal anymore and that other people have a right to her money. She has a responsibility to give it away. I thought whoever spent on charity, no matter how much they cud spend, did something good. Its about giving and not about how much others think she shud give. I totally support her, its her money and her choice on how to spend it and who and how many people she wants to help.
And btw those 100s of millions of dollars are made of her work and belong to her, she doesnt owe anyone a single cent. So if she decides to spend 40million then thats great. she doesnt owe it to anyone to spend that 40million. It is a big deal that she chose to spend her money helping others, and even if she did it for fame I still applaud her. I dont know too many people who go around giving away 40million dollars even if for fame. I care about the end result that people got helped, not that Oprah did it for fame, or not that more people could have been helped. It is mainly that she helped someone when she didnt. have to.
I didnt realize that helping 152 girls is not a big deal anymore and that other people have a right to her money. She has a responsibility to give it away.
If compared to what Oprah regularly gives to her studio audience -cars, laptops, ipods, spa treatmnents and many high ticket items, helping just 152 girls seems like no big deal.
No one is disputing her right to her own money but someone so shrewd,intelligent and powerful enough to make a difference to a lot of ppl uses 40 mil$ to help just a few girls, one wonders what happened to doing deed for the greater good. Like the article said she could have helped 8000 schools....
I am thinking from the pov of the girl (153rd) who did not make the selection.
comment:
p_commentcount