I think objectively Pari did not mean anything wrong. Her statement translated for me as: IF COMMITMENT IS EVERYTHING, THEN HOW COULD BUDDY FIND LOVE WITH MY MOM?
But the writers are failing us with their execution. Since Kunal never "paid" the price for his wrong doings, since he never got "questioned" or said sorry for what he did, and how the "love" between Nandini and Kunal was pushed down everyone's throat - leaves a bad feeling in everyone's mind about it. So, it hurts fans or others alike that they are totally "erasing" the part that Kunal owed something to Mauli somehow.
The way I look at this though is that maybe this will lead Pari to realize that her Buddy was wrong? And, that while feelings are everything, there is something that one must stand for - abide by and some value that one needs to give to a commitment... And, Mishti will realize that her father was not intentionally wrong after all. Maybe its about the girls finding their middle ground.
I know no one agrees with me, but I feel that a better execution would have been to reverse the complexes these girls had. So, in my "world", I would have Mishti to be a commitment phobic person (because she thinks what did my mother get despite being so commitment oriented and dedicated, and I don't want to be hurt the same way) while Pari would be the "overly committed" person because she does not want to end up like her parents. And, then, I would have Pari's fiance attracted to Mishti instead (if at all a triangle was necessary) or even otherwise, having the sisters reconcile with their past differently. This would have made sense in acknowledging Ishan also --> that although she agrees she had her popsie, but she just does not want to risk going through this pain somehow.
comment:
p_commentcount