Deepika cannot say don't touch me to Shree

tanvismile thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 6 years ago
#1
There was task when vikas came and I remember kv was standing Deepika behind kv and the way Shree came charging stood there making Deepika so uncomfortable. I think this was the same task where he said mai deta nahi sirf leta hoon crap.
Nways the main thing he made uncomfortable so much that she was in tears. Vikas shouted at Shree. Stop it. Shilpa mocked Deepika s tears saying she is still simar mode. Why couldn't she strongly react like the way she reacted with deepak?


These type of reactions are only for deepak and Romil.

Created

Last reply

Replies

71

Views

5.1k

Users

29

Likes

392

Frequent Posters

Love-u-all thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#2
It's an individual's own choice regardless of gender, who they are comfortable with or not for a physical contact. Siblings can fight get physical and so as boy friend girl friends etc.

But someone who is neither here nor there can not take this liberties and if asked to keep the distance must respect the request. If he or she persists, they can be reprimanded or stoped with force. IMHO.
Edited by Love-u-all - 6 years ago
tanvismile thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 6 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: Love-u-all

It's an individual's own choice regardless of gender, who they are comfortable with or not for a physical contact. Siblings can fight get physical and so as boy friend girl friends etc.

But someone who is neither here nor there can not take this liberties and if asked to keep the distance must respect the request. If he or she persists, they can be reprimanded or stoped with force. IMHO.


I m not against her shouting at deepak or Romil.

But she was clearly hundred times more uncomfortable when Shree did it? Why can't she object like this?

People say she objects him. May be she does but not as strongly as this.
diasingh2 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: tanvismile

Nways the main thing he made uncomfortable so much that she was in tears.


The answer is in your post itself.

Incident 1: A friend( or a person you trust the most) misbehaves with you
Reaction: You get shocked & upset, and you leave the premises. Hence the tears.👏👏

Incident 2: An irritating clown, even after being warned, keeps poking you (literally with fingers).
Reaction: You get angry and STRONGLY tell them to stay away. 👏👏

I see NOTHING wrong in both scenarios.
Edited by diasingh2 - 6 years ago
tanvismile thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 6 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: diasingh2


The answer is in your post itself.

Incident 1: A friend( or a person you trust the most) misbehaves with you
Reaction: You get shocked & upset, and you leave the premises. Hence the tears. 👏👏

Incident 2: An irritating clown, even after being warned, keeps poking you (literally with fingers).
Reaction: You get angry and STRONGLY tell them to stay away. 👏👏

I see NOTHING wrong in both scenarios.


So at first she got shocked and hurt but what next?

Instead of questioning and objecting that behaviour she was justifying and shree was complaining and even threatening.




theBoyWonder thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Easter Egg Contest Winner (2023) Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 6 years ago
#6
Why should Dipika's reactions comply with someone's sense of what is right or wrong! Besides she was emotionally a mess back then! I wouldn't expect her to react the same way! And even if Dipika did not react the same way with Sree, there is rule of law that prevents from objecting now!
Mahek_No1 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 6 years ago
#7
Firstly Deepak was warned not to touch.
Secondly he is no friend of Dipika, even if he was he does not have the right to touch her if she told him not to.


She did not say it was a bad touch, but she was getting irritated, she didnt like it so she warned him, why did he touch her again after being warned not to.


Deepak should understand NO means NO. He is an irritating person as it is.

He irritates everyone. Main uss ghar mein hoti toh abtak uska muh toor kar bahar aa gayi hoti😡.

Mahek_No1 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 6 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: theBoyWonder

Why should Dipika's reactions comply with someone's sense of what is right or wrong! Besides she was emotionally a mess back then! I wouldn't expect her to react the same way! And even if Dipika did not react the same way with Sree, there is rule of law that prevents from objecting now!


Agree with you here 👍🏼
diasingh2 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: Mahek_No1

Firstly Deepak was warned not to touch.

Secondly he is no friend of Dipika, even if he was he does not have the right to touch her if she told him not to.


She did not say it was a bad touch, but she was getting irritated, she didnt like it so she warned him, why did he touch her again after being warned not to.


Deepak should understand NO means NO. He is an irritating person as it is.

He irritates everyone. Main uss ghar mein hoti toh abtak uska muh toor kar bahar aa gayi hoti😡.


@bold🤣 Mahek. I love you for this.😆😳

On topic, I totally agree with you.
Maharani69 thumbnail
Engager Level 4 Thumbnail 8th Anniversary Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 6 years ago
#10
She won't say don't touch me until she herself feels uncomfortable. You cannot expect a person to react the same way in similar situations. Uska comfort level, uski marzi. No one can tell her if she didn't have a problem then she shouldn't have a problem now.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".