Sigh!! Pankhuri was indeed the best choice for RoxanaOriginally posted by: Meghna333
Wow! Thank you so much for informing us! Btw Pankhuri Awashty could have been best choice 😆, never mind Aparna is better than Riya
Sigh!! Pankhuri was indeed the best choice for RoxanaOriginally posted by: Meghna333
Wow! Thank you so much for informing us! Btw Pankhuri Awashty could have been best choice 😆, never mind Aparna is better than Riya
Originally posted by: LawlessLawyer
And I thought I would create some confusion😆😆
Anyway it's great to see you again🤗P.S.IronStrange???❤️Gimme five on this!!
This is only about @bold, which is an interesting point of view. But there is one major problem with it.
Does Shivdutt feature in the montage with equal space with Porus the way Alexander does? No, he does not. So there is no point in equating Alexander and Shivdutt.
Secondly, it is the makers who are constantly dragging in the so-called link of niyati between Porus and Alexander at every possible moment, after first having created the major fiction that they are both of the same age, whereas the real Porus had grown up sons, both of whom died in the battle of the Hydaspes, and a daughter, Kalyani, who was married to Abhi, the king of Takshashila (the present Ambhikumar). It is as if the CVs see this karmic connection, as they put it, between Porus and Alexander, as a kind of umbilical cord!
They do it because without the Alexander connection, their script will lose its vazan. Most Indians know of Porus, or Purushottam, only because he was brave enough, and was devoted enough to his land and its people, to face up to Alexander when no one else was willing to do so, and Alexander is still world famous after 23 centuries. Without Alexander, no one would have specially remembered Porus. He is not a Chandragupta Maurya or a Chanakya or an Ashoka, who are immortalised on their own steam.
How many Indians know anything of Skandagupta, the Gupta emperor of the first half of the 5th century AD? He saved the whole of north India by fighting off the Huns, who were descending on our northwest frontier like locusts. But the Huns are not as glamorous as Alexander the Great, so no one bothers to even remember Skandagupta.
Puru or Porus is the protagonist of this show, and Alexander in the antagonist. That is why they are given equal space in the montage, glowering across at each other. And this is also why at least 20% of the screen time, and so many excellent scenes, including all his major battles to date, are devoted to Alexander and the Macedonian part. Without this Alexander connection, Porus would be just another raja rani fiction show, like Prithvi Vallabh.
Apart from this, I could never understand why such an opulent production was entrusted to Sony, which is mostly the graveyard of good TV, and which singlehandedly drove Yashraj TV out of business thought most of their productions were very good. Sony also sank Anurag Kashyap's Yudh, though, as Amitabh Bachchan's first fiction show on TV, it should have done very well. The channel is manhoos.
Shyamala Cowsik
Originally posted by: LawlessLawyer
Almost all the leading ladies of Porus are artists from MB.I miss my good old MB😭
Anyway coming back to the topic,all I want from the CVs is that they should show some mercy on us poor people who waited for Roxana like anything and execute this love story properly.😳I would like to believe that the writers were high on Bhaang when they wrote the recent tracks😆Hope they recover from the hangover asap and give us a proper AlexAna track ❤️IronStrange is pure awesomeness❤️Sherlock meets Sherlock😎My new UN is after my current favourite Korean drama😆
I feel like a person who has been robbed😡On one side I am glad that they atleast considered to bring Roxana but the fact that we were this close to PankHit's onscreen reunion and yet missed out on them is infuriating.Originally posted by: darkwarrior200
Pankhuri Awasthy was supposed to play Roxanne. But the shoot dates were clashing with her current schedule.
We would get to see PanKhit again im so mad right now
comment:
p_commentcount