Posted:
Originally posted by: lumos_31
Exactly, it's a free world and we are free to object to content that is objectionable. And yes, u don't think so but I do think that makers would be responsible for showing objectionable content on national television on primetime as it is THEM who are responsible for what they are showing, as much as we are for seeing it. And not sure who u were targeting by the term pseudo moralists here, but if it was me, I have already explained why those other shows didn't receive flak for their content and if I do find something objectionable in it, I will object to it, regardless of anything. Things worth banning on national television need to be voiced out against. Period. By twisting my statements like now, and drawing unnecessary and absurd conclusions I dunno what point ur trying to make. Parents not understanding how something their child is watching is influencing him/her does NOT extrapolate to banning some good and sensible content on Indian TV which deserves to be aired just because u want to defend a show with this regressive n crappy concept.I understand u love this show, having interacted with u earlier, fair enough. But atleast do not twist my statements to suit ur argument.
a. objecting is one thing asking ban is another. good that bcc didnt oblige to the senseless ban demand by the likes of you.
b. makers are not responsible for what parents let their kids watch
c. showing crime as crime is not a valid justification for shows you are trying to support. By your own words kids get influenced by what they see 'in ways parents dont understand' n that sets things straight. kids can get influenced by crime thats shown in your criminal shows too.
d. dont generalize the word 'regressive'
comment:
p_commentcount