A hundred hugs for this post. Really.
I am not aware of the intricate details of Bajirao-Mastani marriage in history, but the way it was portrayed in the movie Bajirao-Mastani, I absolutely disliked Mastani. Even though Bhansali tried to portray her as an epitome of secularism and women empowerment, none of that impressed me as I could not reconcile with her role of a home-breaker.But atleast in the movie they showed Bajirao and Kashi's marriage respectfully. Bajirao loved Kashi too.Here they have gone a step ahead. They are portraying Kashi-Bajirao marriage to be a loveless one to justify Bajirao-Mastani's affair...ðŸ˜The precap was very hurtful. First reason for that is entry of Mastani. That is so not needed at this point.Secondly, they are trying to portray as if Kashi is nothing more than a compromise for Bajirao, and it is Mastani who will come and 'save' him from a meaningless, loveless life. By glorifying this kind of a 'love story', the makers are reducing the integrity of all those simple, unfortunate women who love their husbands immensely but get nothing in return. ðŸ˜Even though polygamy was customery then, I think it was practised mainly by royals and Kings. Ministers and common people were less likely to have dozens of wives at home...n were mostly monogamous at that era. Please correct if I am wrong. So, in such a setup, a husband bringing in a second wife/ concubine would not have been very common. This is the major reason why I am not fond of Bajirao-Mastani pair.Maybe I am being judgmental too early, but if they portray Kashi-Bajirao's chemistry in this manner throughout, then it would be very unfortunate. People claim "Bajirao Mastani" as some kind of "epic love story".I wonder what would have happened, if the situation was reversed...aka Kashi falling for another man, despite having a dedicated Bajirao as husband.
More than doormat, I am afraid of something else.
Usually in such serials, they tend to make a villain out of first wives to justify the Amar Prem Gatha of the hero with second/third wives. E.g. Ruqaiyya was portrayed as a bitch to make way for Jodha Akbar, Helena is shown as a petty, heartless fool to glorify Chandra-Nandini...I hope Kashi isnt depicted the same way.
Even though polygamy was customery then, I think it was practised mainly by royals and Kings. Ministers and common people were less likely to have dozens of wives at home...n were mostly monogamous at that era. Please correct if I am wrong. So, in such a setup, a husband bringing in a second wife/ concubine would not have been very common. This is the major reason why I am not fond of Bajirao-Mastani pair.Maybe I am being judgmental too early, but if they portray Kashi-Bajirao's chemistry in this manner throughout, then it would be very unfortunate. People claim "Bajirao Mastani" as some kind of "epic love story".I wonder what would have happened, if the situation was reversed...aka Kashi falling for another man, despite having a dedicated Bajirao as husband.
Originally posted by: .-Amethyst-.
Kashi and viewers both need to solidify their hearts inorder to see this now. 😆
comment:
p_commentcount